Welcome to a session of the Toilet Violations Punishment Committee (TVPC) – this writer’s favorite fantasy. The story takes place in a high school not unlike other high schools. In this high school, however, there are strict rules regarding the toileting behavior of the school’s female students. Those who break the school toilet rules (including the rules against going to the bathroom in your pants) are brought before the TVPC to have their cases heard and their punishment given out if they are guilty. Meetings of the TVPC are called to order at 3:10 PM each school day in the TVPC meeting room – Room 222 of the high school. It should be noted that where this story takes place you need to be 18 in order to enter high school so all persons depicted, even though entirely fictional, are at least 18 years of age.
My name is Arnold Ziffel and I’m chairman of the TVPC. What follows are the summary minutes of the TVPC meeting of Thursday, Oct 17, 2019.
We begin this afternoon’s session of the Toilet Violations Punishment Committee (TVPC) by welcoming Mrs. Watson, Coach of the girls’ Field Hockey team. The team is off to a surprisingly good start this season but apparently hit a major bump in the road yesterday. “We not only suffered our fist loss of the season, Mr. Chairman,” Coach Watson tells me, “But we have 2 matters that require the attention of your committee.” “The restroom facilities over there at Carver HS had no doors on the individual stalls,” the pretty and enthusiastic coach continues, “So I guess it shouldn’t come as a surprise that we had a problem with some of the girls.” “But obviously that doesn’t excuse what my girls did,” Coach Watson explains, turning towards and glaring at the 2 girls accused, “Obviously, they are expected to handle their bodily functions properly regardless of the toilet facilities available.” “I guess the bright side is that we didn’t have a panty-soiling violation, Mr. Chairman,” the coach also tells me, “I know how much they anger your committee, especially when the girls are representing the school at our Field Hockey games.” As faithful readers of the TVPC surely know, accidents and other violations by athletes and others who are representing the school at events with other schools are dealt with more severely than those occurring during the regular school day.
But the first matter before us is indeed an accident violation -- albeit a wetting one. Accused of the “Panty-Wetting” -- and this is, of course, a “While Representing the School” violation -- is a well-rounded junior brunette named Kelly. And Kelly readily pleads “Guilty” to having had a panty-wetting accident as charged by her COACH. “I can’t say that I actually saw her wet her pants,” COACH Watson reports, “As a matter of fact, since we wear skirts for Field Hockey rather than shorts, it wasn’t readily obvious that she’d wet herself even after she’d done it.” “It wasn’t until we got back here after the game that Eve reported it to me,” the coach explains, “A bunch of us had gone to use the girls’ room in the gym hallway once we got back here and it was Eve that reported to me that Kelly had wet panties.” Eve is an tough-minded freshman on the team and a rapidly rising star and team leader. Small in stature, she won‘t back down and whatever the situation she‘ll surely be the LAST MAND STANDING. “Kelly was in there doing a bowel movement and I think Eve had to do one as well,” Coach Watson explains further, “Eve then reported to me that Kelly had wet panties and I then did a panty inspection on her.” Kelly’s panties were definitely wet, Mr. Chairman, “the coach reports, “And I don’t mean that they were just wet with sweat on a hot day.” “They were definitely wet from being urinated in,” she reports further, “And when I confronted her about it, she admitted that she’d had an accident.” “She said she drank a lot of water at halftime and she lost control just as we were getting ready to start the second half of the game,” the coach adds.
I then turn to the pretty junior brunette to get her confirmation of what happened -- she’s already pleaded “Guilty” to it -- but before I can even ask her about it, Eve chimes in. “This was no accident, sir,” the never shy Eve then tells me, “I mean, she definitely did wet her pants but it was definitely no accident.” Immediately, I admonish the over-eager freshman beauty and suggest that if she has something she’d like to say, she should raise her hand and request permission to address the committee. As suggested, Eve then does so and I, of course, grant her such permission. “I’m sorry for calling out like that but it wasn’t really like Kelly and Coach Watson are making it out to be,” Eve tells us, “It wasn’t like Kelly was trying to hold it in and then just accidentally lost control of it.” “I saw what happened, sir and what she did was definitely no accident,” Eve argues, “What happened was that Kelly clearly wet her pants on purpose.” As faithful readers of the TVPC surely know, girls going in their pants on purpose -- even if it’s only wetting -- are punished more severely than those merely having accidents. Eve’s comments draw an audible groan from the assembled crowd and I note a bit of an eye roll from both Kelly and Coach Watson. The problem is that Eve has made similar accusations -- that of girls going in their pants on purpose -- in the past. And while I’m not going to say that all those accusations were false -- at least not in the sense of Eve deliberately making false accusations -- the charges were indeed unfounded.
“Look, I do appreciate that Eve is rapidly becoming a leader on the team and that includes her diligence in reporting toilet violations on the team to me,” Coach Watson tells us. “And obviously, Eve has good toilet habits herself -- especially for a freshman,” she adds, “Be it port-o-potties or doorless stalls like yesterday, nothing seems to faze her.” “But Eve has to realize that just because a girl goes in her pants doesn’t mean she did it on purpose,” the coach continues, turning to look at Eve in the process, “She seems to think that just because a girl refuses to use the available bathroom facilities that constitutes going in her pants on purpose.” I see Eve shaking her head at her coach’s explanation, but I have to say that I’ve seen this before. “It doesn’t have to be that a girl has a realistic chance of holding it in successfully,” I explain to the enthusiastic freshman athlete, “As long as the girl is making ANY attempt at all to hold it in, she’s not considered have gone in her pants on purpose.”
But Eve is insistent that this does indeed qualify as an intentional wetting. “Well, as I indicated before, I didn’t actually see it happen,” Coach Watson reiterates. “I just know that I caught the girl with wet panties,” she explains, “And I really have no reason to believe that it was anything other than an accident.” The coach goes on to tell us that Kelly explained to her that as they were getting ready to take the field after halftime, she suddenly had an emergency and just couldn’t hold it in. “It was a hot day, Mr. Chairman and she thinks she just drank too much water at halftime,” the coach explains, “Apparently it all happened suddenly and she had no time to run to the school to take care of business.” Coach Watson notes that Kelly admitted that she already had to go at the start of halftime, but didn’t go the because she thought she could wait. I note the pretty dark-haired junior nodding her head in agreement with her coach’s account of the incident. “Of course, that was before she drank all that water at halftime,” Coach Watson adds, looking over disapprovingly at the girl. “And, as I said before, I didn’t even know that she had done it until we were back here after the game and I caught her in wet panties in the girls’ room,” she adds, “And I do thank Eve for alerting me about that.”
But Eve disputes that account of the incident. “That’s not how it happened, sir,” the pretty blonde freshman insists, “That’s not how it happened at all.” “It was halftime and Kelly looked like she was already desperate to go,” Eve reports, “In fact, she was looking so desperate that I thought she had to go both ways.” “I was expecting her to head to the school to use the bathroom but she had other ideas,” Eve continues, “Instead, she went over on the side of the bleachers away from everyone else.” “She pulled her skirt away so she was sitting directly on the grass,” the freshman explains further, “It was just her panties between her and the grass.” Eve then tells us that in that position, Kelly just let it go and peed through her panties and onto the grass. “You do it that way and only your panties get wet,” Eve points out, “Your skirt stays dry and the skirt covers up the wet panties so no one knows what you did.”
Looking over at Kelly, she’s shaking her head in disagreement, but the look on her face tells a different story. Besides, this doesn’t seem like something Eve -- or anyone else, for that matter -- would just make up. Coach Watson reiterates her earlier comments that she didn’t see it happen and that all she knows is what the girl told her when she caught her in very wet panties in the girls’ room here after the game. “I really have no reason to believe that Kelly wasn’t telling the truth when she told me it was an accident,” Coach Watson tells us, “Besides, I saw her in the girls’ room there before the game.” “I mean, it makes sense that she’d have to go again after drinking a lot of water at halftime,” the coach argues, “But I doubt she’d already have to go again by the start of halftime after just having gone before the game.”
But I see Eve again just shaking her head. “She took one look at those doorless stalls and decided not to,” Eve tells us, “I know that she had to go but there was no way she was going to be doing it there.” “It was obvious by the way Kelly was walking that she had to go,” Eve explains, “In fact, with the urgency in her step as we all walked from the bus to the girls’ room, I was pretty sure she needed to go both ways.” “But if she did, at least she managed to hold that until we got back here,” Eve explains further, “At least she had enough sense not to do that in her pants as well.”
Again, Kelly has an uncomfortable, worried look on her face. I first ask her if she did, in fact, have to go before the game but avoided doing so because of the bathroom conditions there. At first, she balks at answering the question. But I repeat the question, this time demanding an answer. Reluctantly, she admits that she did. Hearing that, I then ask her if Eve’s account is true. “Did the wetting happen just as Eve said?” I ask the pretty and smart junior beauty, “Did you do it on purpose?” Again, Kelly seems reluctant to answer. “I want the truth, young lady,” I tell her sternly, “It’s one thing to tell your COACH a story, but it’s another thing entirely to lie to the TVPC.” “I think you’re in enough trouble already, Kelly,” I warn her, “You really don’t need to make it worse on yourself by lying now.”
With that, the poor girl just suddenly bursts into tears. “I had to go both ways,” she tells me as the tears flow. “I had to go both ways from the time we first got there,” she then explains, “And I just wanted to cry when I saw that the toilets they had there had no privacy.” She goes on to tell us that she was trying to hold it in but by halftime of the game that was becoming increasingly more difficult -- especially having to hold it in both ways. “I really didn’t want to poop in my pants,” Kelly tells us, “I mean, I really didn’t want to go either way in my panties, but pooping in them is the worst.” She then explains that she didn’t think she could hold it in both ways, so she decided to just go in her pants one way (that is, urination) to focus on holding it in the other way. She then claims that her plan worked because she was able to successfully hold in “the other” and do that in the girls’ room once she got here after the game. “I just went over by myself, spread my skirt out and sat down on the grass,” she explains, “And then I just peed through my panties directly onto the grass.” “It wasn’t so bad,” she claims, “It was really only my panties that got wet.” “No way was that as bad as doing the other in my panties,” she argues, “What else was I supposed to do?”
“Well, how about just doing it in the toilet,” Eve then chimes in incredulously, “How about just going both ways in the toilet like you’re supposed to do.” But Kelly argues that that’s easier said than done with the doorless stalls and lack of privacy there. “Maybe you don’t mind people watching you when you go to the bathroom,” she tells Eve, “But most of us like a little privacy -- Especially when it’s #2 that we gotta do.” But Eve argues right back -- Arguing that it’s not like she actually liked the doorless stalls, either. “Of course, I’d rather have more privacy -- We’d all like to have more privacy for going to the bathroom,” she tells Kelly, “But no way is it an excuse for going in your pants instead.” “I’d still rather go in the toilet any day that go in my pants,” Eve continues, “And that goes DOUBLE when it’s a #2, as you put it.” But Kelly -- suddenly somewhat emboldened -- argues back that even though a bunch of our girls did “pee” with the doorless stalls, none of them went “#2” in there. “So I wouldn’t talk if I were you, Eve,” she tells the outspoken freshman beauty. “Not even you would go #2 in that horrible bathroom,” Kelly tells her, “You don’t think I noticed that you waited and did that in the girls’ room here after we got back?” But Eve just shakes her head. “I didn’t go at the game because I didn’t have to go at the game,” Eve continues, a tinge or anger in her voice, “I mean, I did urinate but that was all I had to do at the time.” “I don’t unnecessarily hold it in when I have to go,” she argues angrily at Kelly, “I go to the girls’ room and do it even if the girls’ room isn’t the greatest.” “I didn’t need to have a bowel movement until we were already on the bus coming back home,” Eve tells her teammate -- and the rest of us, “And when we got back here, I went to the girls’ room and did it in the toilet like I was supposed to!”
With that, I immediately reach for my gavel and bang it. “This is not about Eve’s toilet habits,” I point out, “It’s about Kelly’s wet panties at yesterday’s Field Hockey game. I then direct our TVPC clerk to draw up a new Violation Report on Kelly, amending the charge from a panty-wetting ACCIDENT to doing it on purpose. And Kelly then pleads “Guilty” to the amended charge. “And that’s, of course, still a panty-wetting while representing the school,” I remind her. “Yes, sir,” she then tells me dejectedly, knowing that that will bring her additional punishment. Surprisingly, Kelly has a good toilet record so far this year with no prior accidents and only a “Clogging the Toilet -- Category #2” charge on her record. But going in your panties -- regardless of which particular bodily function it is -- while representing the school is no small matter. For punishment, I offer Kelly a choice. For the wetting, she can either write, “I will not wet my panties in school or at Field Hockey games again” 500 times and serve 3 days detention or write it 300 times and serve a full week of detention. Thinking a moment, she chooses the 500 times and 3 hours of detention.
But, as faithful readers of the TVPC surely know, THAT punishment assumes that the panty-wetting was an accident. “Of course, it doesn’t end there,” I then tell Kelly and note for the record, “Since you did it on purpose, we have to double that punishment.” Hearing that, the poor girl bursts into tears once again. “I have to write that 1,000 times?!” she asks. “Indeed you do,” I tell her, matter-of-factly. She then begs me to reconsider, arguing that not only was it only a wetting but her first of the school year. But I put up my hand to stop any further arguments. “It was also a wetting while representing the school and you did it entirely on purpose,” I remind her. I do, however, offer her a chance to reconsider her options. “I’ll allow you to reconsider and choose 600 times and 2 weeks detention if you’d prefer that,” I explain. Kelly looks puzzled. Obviously, neither option is a pleasant prospect for her. Mrs. Crabtree, a TVPC member, then chimes in and suggests that (following the same pattern) we also offer her the option of writing it 800 times and serving 8 hours of detention. “Alright, you can do that if that’s what you’d prefer,” I then offer. Surprisingly, she then does choose that but she still doesn’t think her punishment is fair. “It’s not fair -- It’s just not fair,” she complains. “It’s my first time and I get all this,” she argues, “Lots of girls have done much worse and never got punished as bad.” “They go the other way in their panties and they don‘t get it this bad,” she adds. “You did it while representing the school and you did it on purpose,” I immediately argue back, “You got what you deserved.”
My name is Arnold Ziffel and I’m chairman of the TVPC. What follows are the summary minutes of the TVPC meeting of Thursday, Oct 17, 2019.
We begin this afternoon’s session of the Toilet Violations Punishment Committee (TVPC) by welcoming Mrs. Watson, Coach of the girls’ Field Hockey team. The team is off to a surprisingly good start this season but apparently hit a major bump in the road yesterday. “We not only suffered our fist loss of the season, Mr. Chairman,” Coach Watson tells me, “But we have 2 matters that require the attention of your committee.” “The restroom facilities over there at Carver HS had no doors on the individual stalls,” the pretty and enthusiastic coach continues, “So I guess it shouldn’t come as a surprise that we had a problem with some of the girls.” “But obviously that doesn’t excuse what my girls did,” Coach Watson explains, turning towards and glaring at the 2 girls accused, “Obviously, they are expected to handle their bodily functions properly regardless of the toilet facilities available.” “I guess the bright side is that we didn’t have a panty-soiling violation, Mr. Chairman,” the coach also tells me, “I know how much they anger your committee, especially when the girls are representing the school at our Field Hockey games.” As faithful readers of the TVPC surely know, accidents and other violations by athletes and others who are representing the school at events with other schools are dealt with more severely than those occurring during the regular school day.
But the first matter before us is indeed an accident violation -- albeit a wetting one. Accused of the “Panty-Wetting” -- and this is, of course, a “While Representing the School” violation -- is a well-rounded junior brunette named Kelly. And Kelly readily pleads “Guilty” to having had a panty-wetting accident as charged by her COACH. “I can’t say that I actually saw her wet her pants,” COACH Watson reports, “As a matter of fact, since we wear skirts for Field Hockey rather than shorts, it wasn’t readily obvious that she’d wet herself even after she’d done it.” “It wasn’t until we got back here after the game that Eve reported it to me,” the coach explains, “A bunch of us had gone to use the girls’ room in the gym hallway once we got back here and it was Eve that reported to me that Kelly had wet panties.” Eve is an tough-minded freshman on the team and a rapidly rising star and team leader. Small in stature, she won‘t back down and whatever the situation she‘ll surely be the LAST MAND STANDING. “Kelly was in there doing a bowel movement and I think Eve had to do one as well,” Coach Watson explains further, “Eve then reported to me that Kelly had wet panties and I then did a panty inspection on her.” Kelly’s panties were definitely wet, Mr. Chairman, “the coach reports, “And I don’t mean that they were just wet with sweat on a hot day.” “They were definitely wet from being urinated in,” she reports further, “And when I confronted her about it, she admitted that she’d had an accident.” “She said she drank a lot of water at halftime and she lost control just as we were getting ready to start the second half of the game,” the coach adds.
I then turn to the pretty junior brunette to get her confirmation of what happened -- she’s already pleaded “Guilty” to it -- but before I can even ask her about it, Eve chimes in. “This was no accident, sir,” the never shy Eve then tells me, “I mean, she definitely did wet her pants but it was definitely no accident.” Immediately, I admonish the over-eager freshman beauty and suggest that if she has something she’d like to say, she should raise her hand and request permission to address the committee. As suggested, Eve then does so and I, of course, grant her such permission. “I’m sorry for calling out like that but it wasn’t really like Kelly and Coach Watson are making it out to be,” Eve tells us, “It wasn’t like Kelly was trying to hold it in and then just accidentally lost control of it.” “I saw what happened, sir and what she did was definitely no accident,” Eve argues, “What happened was that Kelly clearly wet her pants on purpose.” As faithful readers of the TVPC surely know, girls going in their pants on purpose -- even if it’s only wetting -- are punished more severely than those merely having accidents. Eve’s comments draw an audible groan from the assembled crowd and I note a bit of an eye roll from both Kelly and Coach Watson. The problem is that Eve has made similar accusations -- that of girls going in their pants on purpose -- in the past. And while I’m not going to say that all those accusations were false -- at least not in the sense of Eve deliberately making false accusations -- the charges were indeed unfounded.
“Look, I do appreciate that Eve is rapidly becoming a leader on the team and that includes her diligence in reporting toilet violations on the team to me,” Coach Watson tells us. “And obviously, Eve has good toilet habits herself -- especially for a freshman,” she adds, “Be it port-o-potties or doorless stalls like yesterday, nothing seems to faze her.” “But Eve has to realize that just because a girl goes in her pants doesn’t mean she did it on purpose,” the coach continues, turning to look at Eve in the process, “She seems to think that just because a girl refuses to use the available bathroom facilities that constitutes going in her pants on purpose.” I see Eve shaking her head at her coach’s explanation, but I have to say that I’ve seen this before. “It doesn’t have to be that a girl has a realistic chance of holding it in successfully,” I explain to the enthusiastic freshman athlete, “As long as the girl is making ANY attempt at all to hold it in, she’s not considered have gone in her pants on purpose.”
But Eve is insistent that this does indeed qualify as an intentional wetting. “Well, as I indicated before, I didn’t actually see it happen,” Coach Watson reiterates. “I just know that I caught the girl with wet panties,” she explains, “And I really have no reason to believe that it was anything other than an accident.” The coach goes on to tell us that Kelly explained to her that as they were getting ready to take the field after halftime, she suddenly had an emergency and just couldn’t hold it in. “It was a hot day, Mr. Chairman and she thinks she just drank too much water at halftime,” the coach explains, “Apparently it all happened suddenly and she had no time to run to the school to take care of business.” Coach Watson notes that Kelly admitted that she already had to go at the start of halftime, but didn’t go the because she thought she could wait. I note the pretty dark-haired junior nodding her head in agreement with her coach’s account of the incident. “Of course, that was before she drank all that water at halftime,” Coach Watson adds, looking over disapprovingly at the girl. “And, as I said before, I didn’t even know that she had done it until we were back here after the game and I caught her in wet panties in the girls’ room,” she adds, “And I do thank Eve for alerting me about that.”
But Eve disputes that account of the incident. “That’s not how it happened, sir,” the pretty blonde freshman insists, “That’s not how it happened at all.” “It was halftime and Kelly looked like she was already desperate to go,” Eve reports, “In fact, she was looking so desperate that I thought she had to go both ways.” “I was expecting her to head to the school to use the bathroom but she had other ideas,” Eve continues, “Instead, she went over on the side of the bleachers away from everyone else.” “She pulled her skirt away so she was sitting directly on the grass,” the freshman explains further, “It was just her panties between her and the grass.” Eve then tells us that in that position, Kelly just let it go and peed through her panties and onto the grass. “You do it that way and only your panties get wet,” Eve points out, “Your skirt stays dry and the skirt covers up the wet panties so no one knows what you did.”
Looking over at Kelly, she’s shaking her head in disagreement, but the look on her face tells a different story. Besides, this doesn’t seem like something Eve -- or anyone else, for that matter -- would just make up. Coach Watson reiterates her earlier comments that she didn’t see it happen and that all she knows is what the girl told her when she caught her in very wet panties in the girls’ room here after the game. “I really have no reason to believe that Kelly wasn’t telling the truth when she told me it was an accident,” Coach Watson tells us, “Besides, I saw her in the girls’ room there before the game.” “I mean, it makes sense that she’d have to go again after drinking a lot of water at halftime,” the coach argues, “But I doubt she’d already have to go again by the start of halftime after just having gone before the game.”
But I see Eve again just shaking her head. “She took one look at those doorless stalls and decided not to,” Eve tells us, “I know that she had to go but there was no way she was going to be doing it there.” “It was obvious by the way Kelly was walking that she had to go,” Eve explains, “In fact, with the urgency in her step as we all walked from the bus to the girls’ room, I was pretty sure she needed to go both ways.” “But if she did, at least she managed to hold that until we got back here,” Eve explains further, “At least she had enough sense not to do that in her pants as well.”
Again, Kelly has an uncomfortable, worried look on her face. I first ask her if she did, in fact, have to go before the game but avoided doing so because of the bathroom conditions there. At first, she balks at answering the question. But I repeat the question, this time demanding an answer. Reluctantly, she admits that she did. Hearing that, I then ask her if Eve’s account is true. “Did the wetting happen just as Eve said?” I ask the pretty and smart junior beauty, “Did you do it on purpose?” Again, Kelly seems reluctant to answer. “I want the truth, young lady,” I tell her sternly, “It’s one thing to tell your COACH a story, but it’s another thing entirely to lie to the TVPC.” “I think you’re in enough trouble already, Kelly,” I warn her, “You really don’t need to make it worse on yourself by lying now.”
With that, the poor girl just suddenly bursts into tears. “I had to go both ways,” she tells me as the tears flow. “I had to go both ways from the time we first got there,” she then explains, “And I just wanted to cry when I saw that the toilets they had there had no privacy.” She goes on to tell us that she was trying to hold it in but by halftime of the game that was becoming increasingly more difficult -- especially having to hold it in both ways. “I really didn’t want to poop in my pants,” Kelly tells us, “I mean, I really didn’t want to go either way in my panties, but pooping in them is the worst.” She then explains that she didn’t think she could hold it in both ways, so she decided to just go in her pants one way (that is, urination) to focus on holding it in the other way. She then claims that her plan worked because she was able to successfully hold in “the other” and do that in the girls’ room once she got here after the game. “I just went over by myself, spread my skirt out and sat down on the grass,” she explains, “And then I just peed through my panties directly onto the grass.” “It wasn’t so bad,” she claims, “It was really only my panties that got wet.” “No way was that as bad as doing the other in my panties,” she argues, “What else was I supposed to do?”
“Well, how about just doing it in the toilet,” Eve then chimes in incredulously, “How about just going both ways in the toilet like you’re supposed to do.” But Kelly argues that that’s easier said than done with the doorless stalls and lack of privacy there. “Maybe you don’t mind people watching you when you go to the bathroom,” she tells Eve, “But most of us like a little privacy -- Especially when it’s #2 that we gotta do.” But Eve argues right back -- Arguing that it’s not like she actually liked the doorless stalls, either. “Of course, I’d rather have more privacy -- We’d all like to have more privacy for going to the bathroom,” she tells Kelly, “But no way is it an excuse for going in your pants instead.” “I’d still rather go in the toilet any day that go in my pants,” Eve continues, “And that goes DOUBLE when it’s a #2, as you put it.” But Kelly -- suddenly somewhat emboldened -- argues back that even though a bunch of our girls did “pee” with the doorless stalls, none of them went “#2” in there. “So I wouldn’t talk if I were you, Eve,” she tells the outspoken freshman beauty. “Not even you would go #2 in that horrible bathroom,” Kelly tells her, “You don’t think I noticed that you waited and did that in the girls’ room here after we got back?” But Eve just shakes her head. “I didn’t go at the game because I didn’t have to go at the game,” Eve continues, a tinge or anger in her voice, “I mean, I did urinate but that was all I had to do at the time.” “I don’t unnecessarily hold it in when I have to go,” she argues angrily at Kelly, “I go to the girls’ room and do it even if the girls’ room isn’t the greatest.” “I didn’t need to have a bowel movement until we were already on the bus coming back home,” Eve tells her teammate -- and the rest of us, “And when we got back here, I went to the girls’ room and did it in the toilet like I was supposed to!”
With that, I immediately reach for my gavel and bang it. “This is not about Eve’s toilet habits,” I point out, “It’s about Kelly’s wet panties at yesterday’s Field Hockey game. I then direct our TVPC clerk to draw up a new Violation Report on Kelly, amending the charge from a panty-wetting ACCIDENT to doing it on purpose. And Kelly then pleads “Guilty” to the amended charge. “And that’s, of course, still a panty-wetting while representing the school,” I remind her. “Yes, sir,” she then tells me dejectedly, knowing that that will bring her additional punishment. Surprisingly, Kelly has a good toilet record so far this year with no prior accidents and only a “Clogging the Toilet -- Category #2” charge on her record. But going in your panties -- regardless of which particular bodily function it is -- while representing the school is no small matter. For punishment, I offer Kelly a choice. For the wetting, she can either write, “I will not wet my panties in school or at Field Hockey games again” 500 times and serve 3 days detention or write it 300 times and serve a full week of detention. Thinking a moment, she chooses the 500 times and 3 hours of detention.
But, as faithful readers of the TVPC surely know, THAT punishment assumes that the panty-wetting was an accident. “Of course, it doesn’t end there,” I then tell Kelly and note for the record, “Since you did it on purpose, we have to double that punishment.” Hearing that, the poor girl bursts into tears once again. “I have to write that 1,000 times?!” she asks. “Indeed you do,” I tell her, matter-of-factly. She then begs me to reconsider, arguing that not only was it only a wetting but her first of the school year. But I put up my hand to stop any further arguments. “It was also a wetting while representing the school and you did it entirely on purpose,” I remind her. I do, however, offer her a chance to reconsider her options. “I’ll allow you to reconsider and choose 600 times and 2 weeks detention if you’d prefer that,” I explain. Kelly looks puzzled. Obviously, neither option is a pleasant prospect for her. Mrs. Crabtree, a TVPC member, then chimes in and suggests that (following the same pattern) we also offer her the option of writing it 800 times and serving 8 hours of detention. “Alright, you can do that if that’s what you’d prefer,” I then offer. Surprisingly, she then does choose that but she still doesn’t think her punishment is fair. “It’s not fair -- It’s just not fair,” she complains. “It’s my first time and I get all this,” she argues, “Lots of girls have done much worse and never got punished as bad.” “They go the other way in their panties and they don‘t get it this bad,” she adds. “You did it while representing the school and you did it on purpose,” I immediately argue back, “You got what you deserved.”
Comment