Pooping couple

[Dodge2075]

My wife and I are both in to panty pooping. We care in our mid 30's.

Are there any other couples out there who enjoy doing this together?

We both enjoy changing each others pants after an accident and cleaning each other. My wife is a natural popper in that she will mess her pants but carry on doing whatever she was doing, as if nothing was wrong. She wil say things like, I ve just used the toilet, my bottom feels warm, I've pooped, I feel sticky, Mr kaka has paid a visit, didn't make it.

I like to be desperate, and will say that I need to go. I like to hold myself and she will take me up to the toilet and I have a accident half way up the stairs. She likes to feel my bottom and will hold it as we go to the bathroom where she takes my pants down and does a clean up.

My wife is much bolder than I am. She actually did it in her pants talking to our neighbours. We were taking over the garden fence for about 20 minetes and she started to fidget, and said that she felt hot. We carried on talking and a while later she said 'ive just had a wet fart, oh I'm messing myself' she stood there as if it was quite a natural thing to do with no embarrassment. Then she said that she had better go and change as it was going down her legs.

More to come

[Scotsboy]

I love the fact your wife will carry on as if nothing happened after she's messed her pants. How long does she usually wear her messed pants? I love when wetters do this as well. Carry on until their pants have dried again. Would love to live with someone like this.

[Apemantus]

Thing is Dodge, some of your earlier stories have clearly been embellished or made up, so kinda hard to really believe this one. Great if it is true but without some form of photographic evidence, it'll be filed in the potential bullshit drawer...

Oh and one thing that this post prompts me to say - always makes me laugh when someone says they/their partner are really adventurous and bold and yet they never post any pics. I am NOT bold and I have posted faceless pics!

[paco]

I love the fact your wife will carry on as if nothing happened after she's messed her pants. How long does she usually wear her messed pants? I love when wetters do this as well. Carry on until their pants have dried again. Would love to live with someone like this.

My sentiments exactly.

[Dodge2075]

I have a few pictures of me, but none of the wife. See the male section. I will post some of me later in the week. She just wont have it, so it's down to believing me or just using your imagination.

As to how long she keeps her messed pants on depends on her really. If we are in the garden it could be all the time until we come in. On the occasion with the neighbours she went straight to the bathroom.

[Apemantus]

She just wont have it, so it's down to believing me or just using your imagination.

Thing is this is also a woman who has shit herself whilst you were chatting in the garden with the neighbour, so at one moment you expect us to believe she "is much bolder than I am" and then the next post, you expect us to believe she is all shy and retiring.

So, alas, I smell more than just human shit in this tale.

Nothing wrong with fantasy or imagination, lots of people do get off on it, I just prefer people to be honest, label their threads accordingly, and not talk out of the same hole they excrete from.

[Maria]

I have not read Dodge's earlier posts, so am not sure what parts sound like fantasy, but I do feel, Apemantus, as if you are being a bit harsh in your judgment.

Some years ago I used alt.com to connect with men who had an interest in this fetish. I just wanted to know what it would be like to meet a man who might think I was "sexy" with my pants full. This led me to several incidents wherein I pulled stunts very similar to what Dodge alleges for his wife, like walking through a mall with full pants and pretending not to care (even though I was wearing two pairs of panties so that nothing would fall out, a loose dress so that no one could see anything, and my heart was pounding with terror because I couldn't believe I was actually doing it).

So yes, I have taken part with kinky partners in acts of similar "boldness."

At the same time, I have an absolute horror about allowing myself to be photographed. I cannot escape the dread that someone I know might see me, and I would be "out of the closet."

Of course, you will probably reply: "The only people who would see you would be those who access websites like this one, hence kindred spirits, and you would probably enjoy their company even more than usual once your shared interest was known!"

Now, logically, you're right. Absolutely right and no question about it. But emotionally it still quite literally scares the poop out of me.

[spandexman]

Some peope can not afford to be photographed

A large percentage of guests on the Jerry Springer Show for example have been fired from jobs, that included a Diaper Pail Pal, a guy that pretended to be a dog for his mistress and numerous others. I my state a couple politicians have been embarrassed by pictures on swingers sites, so it isn't fair to demand pictures from everyone.

[Apemantus]

I have not read Dodge's earlier posts, so am not sure what parts sound like fantasy, but I do feel, Apemantus, as if you are being a bit harsh in your judgment.

Some years ago I used alt.com to connect with men who had an interest in this fetish. I just wanted to know what it would be like to meet a man who might think I was "sexy" with my pants full. This led me to several incidents wherein I pulled stunts very similar to what Dodge alleges for his wife, like walking through a mall with full pants and pretending not to care (even though I was wearing two pairs of panties so that nothing would fall out, a loose dress so that no one could see anything, and my heart was pounding with terror because I couldn't believe I was actually doing it).

So yes, I have taken part with kinky partners in acts of similar "boldness."

At the same time, I have an absolute horror about allowing myself to be photographed. I cannot escape the dread that someone I know might see me, and I would be "out of the closet."

Of course, you will probably reply: "The only people who would see you would be those who access websites like this one, hence kindred spirits, and you would probably enjoy their company even more than usual once your shared interest was known!"

Now, logically, you're right. Absolutely right and no question about it. But emotionally it still quite literally scares the poop out of me.

Thing is, Maria, you can be photographed without showing anything other than your body? I do remember the pic you posted of yourself, so if you were to be outed, I suspect it has already happened! But, more to the point, anyone can take a few pics of themselves in their bathroom, removing any objects that identify the place, or taking it at different angles, they can also chop and edit the photos and then they can post them online. I am certainly not saying people need expose their faces, but to my mind, if they won't even take an anonymous photo, it either means they don't understand modern cameras and software, or they are not for real.

Problem if you are a fake, is even the ones you can find on the net will have already been viewed.

I called out Dodge because he has previously posted patently ridiculous stories about random strangers knocking on the door with their pants full.

Just to emphasise - I have no problem with fantasy or fakes, just label them so people like myself can ignore them.

What does bug me is people claiming something to be true when it is not - it brings down the whole fetish crowd because it means that so much bullshit is interspersed amongst the real stuff.

Dodge's stories and then this thread just have too many holes and that means they decrease the overall quality of contributions, as far as I am concerned.

I have just posted this in another thread, but it applies perfectly here, including to you, Maria:

"There was a very attractive lady on one of the diaper sites who wore with a mask - she had a gorgeous body, you could see her hair and cheekbones enough to assume she had an equally gorgeous face, but you could never in a million years identify her."

Try it, you might be surprised by how much fun it is!

[Maria]

Thing is, Maria, you can be photographed without showing anything other than your body? I do remember the pic you posted of yourself, so if you were to be outed, I suspect it has already happened! But, more to the point, anyone can take a few pics of themselves in their bathroom, removing any objects that identify the place, or taking it at different angles, they can also chop and edit the photos and then they can post them online. I am certainly not saying people need expose their faces, but to my mind, if they won't even take an anonymous photo, it either means they don't understand modern cameras and software, or they are not for real.

Well, I actually only like to give photos to "select friends," and I always show my face. I am a person, not a crotch. The real reason I don't post photos is one of vanity -- a middle-aged gal with a butt the size of a small continent? Gimme a break!

And it is true that I really don't understand modern cameras and software!

stories about random strangers knocking on the door with their pants full.

I agree that this is unlikely in the extreme. No one does stuff like that.

[Apemantus]

Well, I actually only like to give photos to "select friends," and I always show my face. I am a person, not a crotch. The real reason I don't post photos is one of vanity -- a middle-aged gal with a butt the size of a small continent? Gimme a break!

Fair enough, though I think you have been around here long enough to know that you would get a very positive reception to your middle aged continental size butt!

Alas, with Dodge, his previous posts do undermine his claims of veracity and I think it is reasonable to call him out on it as he seems to think his missus does not have those issues in some situations, but not when it comes to proving his veracity.

All I think is that in the world of the internet, if someone makes the outrageous claims he does, they should back them up in some form and if they don't, they cannot expect people like myself not to be suspicious and if he has every right not to post photos, I have every right to call him out on it.

[pantiespooper]

What does bug me is people claiming something to be true when it is not - it brings down the whole fetish crowd because it means that so much bullshit is interspersed amongst the real stuff.

Dodge's stories and then this thread just have too many holes and that means they decrease the overall quality of contributions, as far as I am concerned.

I might be best if you speak for yourself --- not for the whole sorority or fraternity; or both. Actually, the two should not be separated this way. Some just have to do it.

[Apemantus]

I might be best if you speak for yourself --- not for the whole sorority or fraternity; or both. Actually, the two should not be separated this way. Some just have to do it.

Afraid I can't make sense of your sentence, but what I can glean leads me to simply point out these phrases from my posts:

"I think" several times
"as far as I am concerned"
"I"
"myself"

This is a discussion board, everyone has the right to express their views. I never claim to speak for anyone but myself (I never say we, or us) but in the same way that you posted your opinion (incomprehensibly, alas), I posted mine. Please feel free to disagree with the substance of what I said, as have other posters, and we can discuss, but it could get tedious if we start to discuss how we discuss rather than what we discuss. I think. But hey, you can disagree with me on that too!

[Adrian6970]

Truth is often stranger than fiction. Just because something sounds improbable, that doesn't necessarily mean it's not true. Such is the nature of the internet however that people can and do post makebelieve stuff on forums. Occasionally that gets extended to men pretending to be women and vice versa. However on a watersports/toilet forum I think the fair policy is to assume (a) that people are who they claim to be and (b) what they say is basically true. Why? Because whilst it's impossible to verify poster's claims about themselves and their experiences, it's equally impossible to disprove them either. Nobody likes being called a liar or having doubt cast on their credentials. I, for one, am prepared to take Dodge at his word and I hope others here will do the same.