Video - Caught wetting her pants in a public bathroom

[TVGuy]

I just uploaded a new free video to HD Wetting. It shows Sammy peeing in her jeans in a public bathroom. Things don't go quite as planned when someone else walks into the bathroom and discovers the puddle on the floor.

[DeltaFoxtrot]

LOL

Blooper vids are always classic.

At least she had the presence of mind to do it in the stall and not in the middle of the bathroom.

Perhaps she'll remember to bring along a chux pad next time.

[PP1]

Great public wetting. It looks like she's at a shopping mall. I'll be interested to see the whole clip.

[Drying]

I like the real public wetting.
The ending was totally acted though.

[Supermaxx]

That's pretty obviously someone in on it and *acting* surprised/grossed out.

[TVGuy]

Actually, no one was in on it. We did not plan on it happening and what you see is not acted. Someone really did come into the bathroom, see Sammy's puddle, and react.

[Sherwood]

Why was she peeing in her jeans in a bathroom cubical?

[PP1]

For us, I bet, if not for herself.

[joejoe798]

Right, just like the time a long while back when you insisted your obviously faked hidden camera video was real. And I'm sure the girl in the public wetting video with Haydee that happens to walk by was totally not in on it in that video either. And in the case of this video the public setting part of it is likely real but the theatrics that start at the end clearly aren't.

Look, there's nothing wrong with making videos like these as long as you admit that it's fantasy when a potential customer asks you seriously. It may seem trivial to some, but there are some people who really get off on "real" scenarios like this and may purchase a subscription based off of the assumption that it is, and then get seriously pissed when they watch it and it's obviously fake. Especially when you use it as a selling point at the end of the video.

Personally I enjoy both real and fantasy scenario's but it bothers me how insulting it is for you to think most people are going to believe this stuff is real. Especially when some people out there could be subscribing to your site based on a lie.

You're probably still going to deny it so at the very least get some better actors or some more believable situations and dialogue next time if you want to fool anyone other then the completely delusional.

Bottom line is you probably have plenty of people who like your stuff as it is there's really no need for this kind of thing. It's bad for business. As you can see, people were happy enough just seeing her wet herself in a remotely public setting. If you want to add extra, just call it what it is next time or more and more people will continue to call you out on it each and every time.

[TVGuy]

I can assure you this video is real.

We have nearly 300 videos on HD Wetting with new ones added on a weekly basis. Most of the videos we are doing now are shot in public. Are you really arguing that with all the public videos we are shooting, someone doesn't ever stumble upon us occasionally?

The hidden camera video was faked, and I had never meant for it to be marketed as real. My girlfriend at the time, Heather, had been helping me out with the site. I asked her to login to the photo board under my name and post the freeze frames. I did not know that she was going to try arguing that it was real, and continue arguing once people called her on it. Once I became aware that was happening I told her to back off and apologized to everyone.

So if we are shooting a video in public, and happen to get caught or have a close call, should I not then post that video because someone might say it is faked and acted?

I have no way to prove the authenticity of what happened, other then that I was there and I know what actually took place. How I can prove that to anyone, I am not sure- but if you have any suggestions please let me know.

When you shoot videos in a public setting though, sometimes things don't go as planned.

[wettermouse]

hmm

All good TVGuy, I like the video either way and your models... well, they're just plain cute. I guess you could post the rest of the video to prove it, but I'm just being a little selfish asking, as I am really intrigued as to what transpired next. All in all, good work, and don't worry about any negative comments. Getting the models to do public shoots must be kinda hard to begin with, although I'd bet that at least a couple of them get off on it.

[joejoe798]

I can assure you this video is real.

We have nearly 300 videos on HD Wetting with new ones added on a weekly basis. Most of the videos we are doing now are shot in public.

I've seen all the video's you're referring to and yes some of them are very public with real people walking by such as the video where Mikki is on the bridge or the one where Haydee is outside of the bathroom.

However in other video's you use trickery to simulate a public wetting especially in your older ones. One of the worst is the video at the fair where you shot the actual wetting when the girls where nowhere near anyone or even still at the fair for that matter, and then actually tried to splice the wetting scene with some background footage of the fair, and then cut back to Mikki standing in the fair with her pants conveniently covered which was obviously filmed before the actual wetting. The best part is during the wetting scene you can actually see people walking around through Mikki's pants when you look close... How can you possibly explain your way out of that? Are we all from Krypton with x-ray vision? Anyone who's a member can go check for themselves it's actually kind of funny. Perhaps you should add that to your free section for everyone to see and judge for themselves.

There's even another older video that I can't recall where someone complained the entire thing was completely edited visually to appear public which was another incident you got called out on by someone long ago. I wish I could remember the details.

The hidden camera video was faked, and I had never meant for it to be marketed as real. My girlfriend at the time, Heather, had been helping me out with the site. I asked her to login to the photo board under my name and post the freeze frames. I did not know that she was going to try arguing that it was real, and continue arguing once people called her on it. Once I became aware that was happening I told her to back off and apologized to everyone.

I remember that thread very clearly and there was never an apology to anyone and it's really laughable that you're actually going to pretend that it wasn't you posting the whole time and you're blaming it on Heather. That's just really sad. But there's no sense even going into that.

So if we are shooting a video in public, and happen to get caught or have a close call, should I not then post that video because someone might say it is faked and acted?

You're not going to have a bunch of people complain a video is fake when it isn't completely obvious that it.

The reason why you have people calling it fake is for one thing, nobody is going to walk into a public bathroom and then instantly spot a tiny river flowing from underneath a stall, and then actually start asking god knows who's behind the stall if it's water. A normal person even if they spotted it would just likely think "wtf is that" and carry about their business. It's just not a reasonable scenario. And that's not even counting the fact that the woman's delivery was clearly over acted.

I have no way to prove the authenticity of what happened, other then that I was there and I know what actually took place. How I can prove that to anyone, I am not sure- but if you have any suggestions please let me know.

Look I can't actually prove that it didn't happen either, I'm just going off of the common sense of what looks real or what looks fake and then combining that with your past history of deception. Oh and you were there? Wasn't Sammy supposedly filming herself alone in a woman's public bathroom? Did you burst in the stall at end of the video like the Kool Aid man? Cause if you did, I'm totally renewing my subscription.

When you shoot videos in a public setting though, sometimes things don't go as planned.

You're right sometimes they don't, but in this case they did because you yourself planned it.

Listen of course you're not going to admit to any of this here and we can keep going back and forth endlessly which is pointless. I don't know how many times people have to call you out for you to learn your lesson. I just hope this time it will actually raise a red flag in your head next time you think about doing this.

Also, I'm sure a lot of your current members don't care if something you claim is legit or not they just want to see your models either way, but hopefully I prevent anyone new from joining your site strictly under false pretenses who do care about that sort of thing.

[Peevert]

Not showing the ending, and baiting us to purchase a membership just to see it, is a textbook example of SPAM.

Paul puts up with a lot from his competitors using this board to publicise their own material, but I would draw the line by prohibiting this level of clear unadulterated SPAM.

[TVGuy]

Not showing the ending, and baiting us to purchase a membership just to see it, is a textbook example of SPAM.

Paul puts up with a lot from his competitors using this board to publicise their own material, but I would draw the line by prohibiting this level of clear unadulterated SPAM.

You get to see Sammy pee her pants in a public bathroom. None of the peeing is edited or obscured in anyway. Yes, there is more that happens after the peeing, but the wetting is shown in its entirety.

[DeltaFoxtrot]

You get to see Sammy pee her pants in a public bathroom. None of the peeing is edited or obscured in anyway. Yes, there is more that happens after the peeing, but the wetting is shown in its entirety.

Dude, you might as well quit trying. You don't need to defend your product, people will either buy it for entertainment or they won't. Nobody can prove that it was or wasn't staged, so its your word against theirs. Arguing just makes you look stupid. Let 'em think what they want to think.