Awesome YouTube wetting! :)

[daniel0509]

http://www.youtube.com/user/sarahsarah1993

[blahblahblargz]

That's a guy.

[kevy19]

That's a guy.

I think you are right!

Kev

[liesje]

That's a guy.

Or at least used to be a guy :-)

[daniel0509]

That´s not a guy, look at the end of the Jeans video...she stands there in underwear. If it is a guy, you would have seen that..

[addebayor]

Are you sure it's a guy?

[kevy19]

Or at least used to be a guy :-)

I have looked at all the videos now very closely and I can see no hard evidence (sorry about the pun there)! That this is a girl or guy! So maybe we should assume a girl!? But having been out with many lovely ladies in my 50 + years looking at his / hers rear and legs and body curves this all does look very mannish as do his body postures too! So don't be fooled by anything you see these days a good friend of mine went out with what he thought was a lovely girl looks body etc! But all was not quite what it seemed he later told me!!!!!! He was quite shocked!

Kev

[blahblahblargz]

That´s not a guy, look at the end of the Jeans video...she stands there in underwear. If it is a guy, you would have seen that..

I am 100% certain it's a male. One can tuck their penis between their legs, you know, a trick some crossdressers use.

The person has large hands, broad shoulders, masculine arms, legs, and rear, fake breasts, and boy's haircut.

[PP1]

I looked at the three videos after daniel's orignal post and thought they were well-made amature clips published by a slender gal who seemed to like wetting her pants. I hoped that more would be forthcoming.

When doubts about gender arose, I looked again. The person is androgynous for sure, but I don't think the arms and legs are particularly masculine due to the absence of muscular definition.

Unless someone knows the person who published these clips, 100% certainty as to gender cannot be established in the absence of explic shots of his/her genitalia.

Enjoyment is in the eye of the beholder, so perhaps some members of this board will like them while others will not.

[PP1]

I looked at the three videos after daniel's orignal post and thought they were well-made amature clips published by a slender gal who seemed to like wetting her pants. I hoped that more would be forthcoming.

When doubts about gender arose, I looked again. The person is androgynous for sure, but I don't think the arms and legs are particularly masculine due to the absence of muscular definition.

Unless someone knows the person who published these clips, 100% certainty as to gender cannot be established in the absence of explic shots of his/her genitalia.

Enjoyment is in the eye of the beholder, so perhaps some members of this board will like them while others will not.

[PP1]

Sorry about the double post. I'm not trying to elevate my status here. It was a inadvertent double click.

[AramFingal]

i think its a guy based on the pattern created in the first video when he/she squats down and pees. a female would have a much wetter ass.

all the other stuff about body shape is also true, but this would seem to clinch it for me

[DeltaFoxtrot]

So androgynous it's really hard to tell. Still not big on vids with no face shots.

[liesje]

I don't really care whether it's a guy or a girl. I can appreciate a sexy tranny :-)

[Drying]

I don't really care whether it's a guy or a girl. I can appreciate a sexy tranny :-)

I can not. But since I have no evidence either way, I'm going to assume this is a girl. Makes the clips much better