Bladder battle, almost pee herself in jeans YT

[pipi]

I changed the original title because she doesn't wet herself like the original title suggests. Very good desperation tho.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQlqKzpefp8

Pipi

[toiletcontroller]

Nice find Pipi, there's nothing better than a nice tight pair of jeans, legs crossed and a little squirming....

[louis]

thanks I love the way she twists, squeezes a crosses her legs, it's suttle but very sexy.

[johnnyc82]

Gave me a huge boner and she didn't even pee

[wetfan]

Sadly it's gone. Did anyone save it by chance?

[pipi]

Sadly it's gone. Did anyone save it by chance?

Sure: http://www.sendspace.com/file/tewh42

Pipi

[Scotsboy]

What's going on with YouTube? How on earth can a tame desperation sighting be a violation of their policy of nudity and sexual content? You would only have noticed she was desperate if you looked closely. Are they saying someone desperate to pee is sexual content? Good grief. There are many wetting videos there that haven't been deleted. YouTube's policy doesn't make sense.

[brian prime]

you will notice it is only female wetting. there are some pretty gross male vids on there i have stumbled across and they are not just pee. they also think its ok to have the execution of a goung girl for not wearing a headscarf, i read about that in the paper. they thought that ok. double standards, they need a decent rival.

[Ellipsis]

Honestly, they probably didn't even look at the vid before they took it down. I hang out on YT a lot for non-fetish-related reasons, and it seems like the admins there don't do any investigation when vids get flagged unless it's a massive channel or Youtube partner. I frequently see people get vids taken down just because they pissed off one or two random other people (usually by doing literally nothing) and those people decided to false-flag their shit in "retaliation". I've literally seen political rants get taken down because someone reported it as spam and Youtube didn't so much as even look into it, just took the flagger at his word. It's a goddamn mess driven by a community where large sections of the userbase spend more time figuring out reasons to hate each other than actually enjoying themselves (much like Wetset in a sense, now that I think about it).

Anyway, when you look at it from that perspective, it makes complete sense that they took this vid down despite there not even being a wetting. It was reported as sexual content, and the title fit, so it's sexual content as far as they're concerned.

[Scotsboy]

Honestly, they probably didn't even look at the vid before they took it down. I hang out on YT a lot for non-fetish-related reasons, and it seems like the admins there don't do any investigation when vids get flagged unless it's a massive channel or Youtube partner. I frequently see people get vids taken down just because they pissed off one or two random other people (usually by doing literally nothing) and those people decided to false-flag their shit in "retaliation". I've literally seen political rants get taken down because someone reported it as spam and Youtube didn't so much as even look into it, just took the flagger at his word. It's a goddamn mess driven by a community where large sections of the userbase spend more time figuring out reasons to hate each other than actually enjoying themselves (much like Wetset in a sense, now that I think about it).

Anyway, when you look at it from that perspective, it makes complete sense that they took this vid down despite there not even being a wetting. It was reported as sexual content, and the title fit, so it's sexual content as far as they're concerned.

The question is who reported it as sexual content? There are people living very sad unfulfilled lives if the mild desperation of a girl is enough for them to make a complaint. Pathetic.

[wetfan]

Sure: http://www.sendspace.com/file/tewh42

Pipi

Thank you!