YT 2 girls desperate (great video)

[dalton]

From France. 2009, but new to me

http://www.*outube.com/watch?NR=1&v=p612g_kvVxk

[KingPlant]

From France. 2009, but new to me

http://www.*outube.com/watch?NR=1&v=p612g_kvVxk

Half a million hits - yet you have to bastardise the link - Why??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=p612g_kvVxk

[Omo Rashi]

To me, this clip is very well known but worth watching it (more than) twice. I also appreciate it when people are careful and do not give a direct link to it. Unfortunately you can't prevent other people from overriding this precautionary measure. The same has happened to me. I wish people would simply respect the reflection of others even if their own opinion is different.

[KingPlant]

To me, this clip is very well known but worth watching it (more than) twice. I also appreciate it when people are careful and do not give a direct link to it. Unfortunately you can't prevent other people from overriding this precautionary measure. The same has happened to me. I wish people would simply respect the reflection of others even if their own opinion is different.

It doesn't make any difference whether the link is full or partial. I copy and paste the link into the address bar and replace the 'y' that was removed witch gives the same hit result as if I had clicked a direct link to it.

That movie has been on here three times so for with direct links and still it's on youtube and had a half a million hits. Lets face it, the reason some links get removed is because someone who comes on here who doesn't want us to get movies for free could easily flag movies of interest and not the ones that are quite tame - like this one.

If they think it might hurt their business interests they flag it as copyright or some other bull shit reason.

[dalton]

It doesn't make any difference whether the link is full or partial. I copy and paste the link into the address bar and replace the 'y' that was removed witch gives the same hit result as if I had clicked a direct link to it.

That movie has been on here three times so for with direct links and still it's on youtube and had a half a million hits. Lets face it, the reason some links get removed is because someone who comes on here who doesn't want us to get movies for free could easily flag movies of interest and not the ones that are quite tame - like this one.

If they think it might hurt their business interests they flag it as copyright or some other bull shit reason.

It has nothing to do with the number of hits.

I work in Internet hosting. As soon as someone clicks on a website-link EVERY webmaster, including YouTube moderators and the YouTube moderation software, can see where the click is comming from. This makes it very easy for moderators or moderation software to censor content on basis of the origin of the traffic. Millions of videos are posted on YouTube,

If some pastes a link in his browser, the hit is just registered as a direct hit and nobody will know it's comming from WetSet for example. YouTube probably does not like WetSet traffic, because their main stream advertisers (like Google Adsense) don't want to be associated with (traffic from) porn and fetish sites. That's probably the reason so many YouTube videos are removed within hours/minutes after a clickable link is posted on WetSet for example. Porn ad fetish videos are against the terms of service.

Please respect everyone's opinion here, guys. Peeeeaaace

[KingPlant]

So please explain why some links stay on youtube and some don't. Even though links have been posted here in full just like this very link.

[bwetfan]

Whether or not this video has a referral from Wetset has nothing to do with it still being up. It has not been removed because there is no reason to remove it. It doesn't even have wetting, much less a good piss stream.

[KingPlant]

Whether or not this video has a referral from Wetset has nothing to do with it still being up. It has not been removed because there is no reason to remove it. It doesn't even have wetting, much less a good piss stream.

But that's contradiction what you say about the advertisers not wanting YouTube to be associated with links from places like this. The hits will be the same even though it isn't porn. When related to a fetish site it then becomes porn - but that's another debate.

Getting back to your point. We have been through this a million times before. It has been debated over and over again and the majority census, from what I gathered, is that it makes no difference whether you direct click or copy and paste. I personally think it is more likely someone just spoiling the fun for others for whatever their reason.

[bwetfan]

But that's contradiction what you say about the advertisers not wanting YouTube to be associated with links from places like this.

I think you've confused me with somebody that commented above me in the thread.