sharka public pissgirl

[toiletcontroller]

very public wetting in white hot pants:

http://www.heavy-r.com/video/119113/...ite_Hot_Pants/

[n2whettin]

Hot damn. Thanks for sharing!

[Omo Rashi]

These ppg vids are really hot stuff. When I watch them I can't believe, however, that so many people seem to not take notice of the scene at all! If anything like that happened in my town, I am sure people would not pass on, would stare at her, would protest - something like that. I realize these videos have been made in East European countries. But are they that little interested over there?? There is something about it which wants to tell me it isn't real... Would it technically be possible to merge two vids, unifying two clips which were made independently? Otherwise I have no explanation for the lack of attraction created by a well-built porn model, publicly pissing herself in a busy street.

[DeltaFoxtrot]

They are quite real. No longer in production because the police ordered the producer to stop. You'd be amazed how oblivious people are to what's going on around them.

[PP1]

Of course it'spossible to film someone in front of a green screen then merge the subject onto any background. It's done all the time in Hollywood and on every TV channel that has weather forecasts.

Some of the PPG stuff is obviously produced it this manner. How people react to a stunning gal wetting her pants on a public venue like a sidewalk is one thing, but it's impossible for me to believe that general passengers on a trolley or subway would stand within a few millimeters of one and make no effort to avoid getting peed on.

[Scotsboy]

Well, the 2 girls sitting behind her notice she's wetting! And having watched every single PPG video clip, the wettings are noticed in just about every one. Some more than others. Of course they were filmed in public. Didn't someone raise this ridiculous question before?

[Omo Rashi]

Well, the 2 girls sitting behind her notice she's wetting! And having watched every single PPG video clip, the wettings are noticed in just about every one. Some more than others. Of course they were filmed in public. Didn't someone raise this ridiculous question before?

Didn't someone prove his blessed simplicity before? Of course there is always some accomplice. The way the wettings are "noticed" by two girls sitting near-by is clearly planned. (Gino wasn't silly!)

[Scotsboy]

Didn't someone prove his blessed simplicity before? Of course there is always some accomplice. The way the wettings are "noticed" by two girls sitting near-by is clearly planned. (Gino wasn't silly!)

What about all the people in the other videos noticing as well? Did Gino plan all of them too? Of course not. You have an over active imagination. Just take them for what they are... great public wetting videos. Your paranoia is tiresome. Let it go.

[Scotsboy]

It's sad when people who think something is too good to be true, there has to be a reason for it to be that way. That what you see isn't real, but actually an optical illusion. There's always that minority out there who try to take something good down and look at the negative aspects, which don't actually exist most of the time. They are people who live sad, unfulfilled lives. And no, I don't feel sorry for them. I just wish they would take their misery elsewhere.

[Reelingsilk]

It seems very real.

All of Pissgirl/Shitgirl stuff is filmed in Prague I think, where most people are quite OK with letting other people do whatever the hell they want. There is also public pissing from another site that films most of their stuff in Hungary.

[Scotsboy]

It seems very real.

All of Pissgirl/Shitgirl stuff is filmed in Prague I think, where most people are quite OK with letting other people do whatever the hell they want. There is also public pissing from another site that films most of their stuff in Hungary.

Yes, I recognise Prague in quite a few of the videos. If green screens were used, it would have been noticeable. The fact the models are in amongst the general public and not placed in front of them proves it's very real. I mean, why go to the bother of attempting such a thing? Far too much hassle and hard work. Just start the camera and let them perform.

[Omo Rashi]

Your paranoia is tiresome. Let it go.

You may believe what your brain allows, but why do you use vocabulary like "ridiculous" (unnecessarily poisening an until then quiet thread) and "paranoia"? What makes you take the liberty to give advice of the kind "Let it go" in a certain tenor? It is not you who decides what people may ask and reflect, and it is not you who has to give advice to other people.

Edit: A short check of your contributions convinced me that your normal style is not at all as unpleasant as in this thread. That nourishes my hope to be just a victim of a unique derailment, for whatever reason. Still, I won't continue any discussion once the sketched character is reached.

[Scotsboy]

You may believe what your brain allows, but why do you use vocabulary like "ridiculous" (unnecessarily poisening an until then quiet thread) and "paranoia"? What makes you take the liberty to give advice of the kind "Let it go" in a certain tenor? It is not you who decides what people may ask and reflect, and it is not you who has to give advice to other people.

Edit: A short check of your contributions convinced me that your normal style is not at all as unpleasant as in this thread. That nourishes my hope to be just a victim of a unique derailment, for whatever reason. Still, I won't continue any discussion once the sketched character is reached.

What makes me take the liberty? Because it's my opinion and I have the freedom to do so. When someone like yourself comes up with ridiculous (there, I've said it again) suggestions, I will respond with what I think. Just like anybody else has the right to do so on a public forum, as long as it is not abusive.

I'm not deciding what people may ask and reflect (again, part of your over active imagination), but if I feel someone needs advice (like you do), I will give it. You will find that on public forums, everyone has the freedom to do that. So climb down off your pedestal.

In my other posts, I don't usually have to exchange views with someone like yourself, so there's no reason to be unpleasant. But when someone winds me up like you do, I have to reply with honest thoughts. No "unique derailment" there. If you take them personally, that's your problem.

Final point. Take a look at other PPG videos. Then you will see how silly your theory is. And if you have seen other PPG videos, there you are even more ridiculous than I already think.

[PP1]

I didn't say the models aren't sexy or that their wettings aren't real and erotic. Moreover, I actually enjoyed several PPG clips when they were originally offered. I just don't find the interaction with the background and the other people very plausible.

When movies have scenes in which the actors (or stuntmen) stand in front of exploding buildings and get blasted ten or twenty feet through the air by shock waves, I recognize it as fictive entertainment.

[Talshia]

'Green screen' nonsense

These films are genuinely made in public, I'm certain. The 'green screen' idea doesn't fly. For one thing, films made in this way are usually obvious. The background has a flat appearance which just doesn't look right. Besides, many of the shots are obviously done at distance and zoomed in. People walk between the camera and the model. How do you do that with a 'green screen'? If it can be done, it would have to be with the kind of equipment more at home in Hollywood than with an amateur film maker.