Header ads

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

sharka public pissgirl

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    This is a silly discussion. All of you who think this is faked, you obviously aren't public wetters yourselves. I have been for close to thirty years, and have wet myself in countless cities and crowds. Very few people even notice. With the few that do, most either glance and look away, either in disgust or indifference. Practically no one will stare at you during the act.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by moosehead68
      This is a silly discussion. All of you who think this is faked, you obviously aren't public wetters yourselves. I have been for close to thirty years, and have wet myself in countless cities and crowds. Very few people even notice. With the few that do, most either glance and look away, either in disgust or indifference. Practically no one will stare at you during the act.
      I have to agree with moosehead68's observation. I have shot many public scenes in my Patches videos over the years and the more people who are around the girls who are wetting themselves, the less chance that they will be seen. It also works the other way... if there are only a few people nearby, there is a much greater chance the girls will be seen and watched. I know this is counter-intuitive to what you would expect but this is the way it always works.

      I have often wondered why it works this way and I really don't have an answer. It might have something to do with people's reluctance to make eye contact with individuals in a large group but this is just a speculation.

      Comment


      • #18
        The final thing I will say on this matter is it all looks natural to me. My favourite PPG video is Marina wetting herself standing on a tube, and her pee runs down the aisle under seated passengers' feet. Very real. Perhaps I should upload it somewhere.

        If certain people don't believe it's real, let them believe that. I don't think we will convince then otherwise. And I'm not losing sleep over that.

        Comment


        • #19
          wow I only posted the clip for people to enjoy, not to start world war 3!

          Comment


          • #20
            The main reason it's obvious the PPG vids are legitimately public wetting (the real McCoy, if you will) is that on a regular basis, the model is seen to be behind obstacles. Buses, trains, trolleys, people, signs, polls, pillars, support beams, you name it. She is generally standing somewhere at a relatively large distance from the camera and passing between things - that sort of shot cannot be accomplished with simple green screen techniques and trickery...you would need sophisticated Hollywood editing software and a replica set with the key obstacles in place to make that happen.

            Hard to believe some people work so hard to see deception where none exists.

            Comment


            • #21
              What! You mean they are for real? I thought they were hand drawn cartoons!

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Scotsboy
                The final thing I will say on this matter is it all looks natural to me. My favourite PPG video is Marina wetting herself standing on a tube, and her pee runs down the aisle under seated passengers' feet. Very real. Perhaps I should upload it somewhere.
                Omo Rashi really needs to see how wrong he is.

                Some old PPG vids

                Comment


                • #23
                  Thanks for posting this extensive collection. We can enjoy our favorites regardless of our individual opinions as to how they were made.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    It's a shame it all had to come to an end. My favourites were Marina and Sandra. I wonder what they're up to these days? I wish another video maker could film them wetting in public again!

                    Not enough public wetting videos are being made. And when I say public, I don't mean outside with nobody about: I mean with many people nearby. Although, I understand why nobody wants to risk it.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by PP1
                      Thanks for posting this extensive collection. We can enjoy our favorites regardless of our individual opinions as to how they were made.
                      Good grief, after watching the clips, I didn't think there would still be individual opinions! It's just how you see it. Can't understand why you're looking so hard for something that's not there.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Give it a rest, dude. You believe what you want, and I'll do the same.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          There's nothing to believe!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Public Wetting

                            Originally posted by Patches
                            I have to agree with moosehead68's observation. I have shot many public scenes in my Patches videos over the years and the more people who are around the girls who are wetting themselves, the less chance that they will be seen. It also works the other way... if there are only a few people nearby, there is a much greater chance the girls will be seen and watched. I know this is counter-intuitive to what you would expect but this is the way it always works.

                            I have often wondered why it works this way and I really don't have an answer. It might have something to do with people's reluctance to make eye contact with individuals in a large group but this is just a speculation.
                            I'm coming into this discussion rather late, and I am not going to wade into the debate about whether PPG videos are "real."

                            But I find the observations made by Patches very interesting.

                            One possible explanation is a phenomenon referred to by psychologists as the bystander effect. It is an attempt to explain, for example, an incident in which a woman is raped on a subway platform while 45 people stand around and do nothing.

                            A public wetting is certainly not analogous to a rape. But the basic concept is that as the size of the group of observers increases, each individual becomes less interested. The phenomenon is not fully understood, but volumes have been written about it.

                            Here's a very brief excerpt from Wikipedia:

                            The bystander effect or Genovese syndrome is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to cases where individuals do not offer any means of help in an emergency situation to the victim when other people are present. The probability of help has often appeared to be inversely related to the number of bystanders; in other words, the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will help. The mere presence of other bystanders greatly decreases intervention. In general, this is believed to happen because as the number of bystanders increases, any given bystander is less likely to notice the situation, interpret the incident as a problem, and less likely to assume responsibility for taking action.
                            LM

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Scotsboy
                              There's nothing to believe!
                              It's like Dawkins vs Creationists.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                maybe I should search for a video of a fish with legs wetting itself in public

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X