A few finds from round the web

[erwinna]

More Sincere Thanks

Aloo,

You spend a LOT of time doing this for us. Few else do. I know my post is just an echo, but thank you so much for the work you put in and for being kind enough to post it.

[WIZZER]

Great finds

Just wish you were into desperation, then I could really appreciate your hard work,
cheers
WIZZER

[Betanumeric]

Fine work!

There's some amazing images in there.

Anyone reading - do remember to click on the images, larger versions are available on nearly all of them.

[Nobody89]

I would just like to point out that the 8th from the bottom, labeled "(Aftermath only, but nice legs and did pee herself)" is of a 13 year old girl(The post links to her Twitter profile, which says she's 13 and in 8th grade). Nothing is really shown, so it's probably not illegal, but the fact remains that this is a picture of a girl who isn't even in high school yet being posted to an adult website.

Other than that minor setback, of course, these are splendid images and I appreciate the effort put into locating and posting them here.

[Major Travis]

Good links, thanks.

[Aloo]

I would just like to point out that the 8th from the bottom, labeled "(Aftermath only, but nice legs and did pee herself)" is of a 13 year old girl(The post links to her Twitter profile, which says she's 13 and in 8th grade). Nothing is really shown, so it's probably not illegal, but the fact remains that this is a picture of a girl who isn't even in high school yet being posted to an adult website.

Other than that minor setback, of course, these are splendid images and I appreciate the effort put into locating and posting them here.

I don't generally post links to images if I know a girl is under 18, but it's innevitable some will sneak through as I don't check the profiles etc of the girls in the images. I simply don't have time, and even if I wanted to, half the time that sort of information is kept private.

So if you see any that turn out to be under 18 then please by all means point them out so others know to avoid them, but there's bound to be one or two from time to time. In this case for example, the image was of just a pair of legs, which also happen to look (IMO) adult. Without accessing her profile I had no way of knowing she was not 18+.

The debate of whether it's illegal or legal to view pictures (of minors) that are not pornographic but may be sexual to some viewers is one that can go on and on, so I will be brief in giving my views.

If people want to argue that an otherwise mundane image becomes sexual if it arouses the viewer (for example through a theme such as peeing) then I can understand that point of view, in fact I'd agree with it.

But not all peeing images are arousing to me. We're not just talking the issue of minors, but also of fat people, old people, dirty people, ugly people etc. If the focus of an image is a 20-stone beast of a woman, she can be pissing all day long and I won't be in the least turned on! In which case I think the image loses it's tag as "sexual", assuming it is not pornographic in nature.

As I have no sexual interest in minors, IMO the same applies here. Even if I find the image arousing whilst I am under the impression the person portrayed is adult, the fact it will turn me off once I know they're a minor removes the sexual element from the image as far as I am concerned. Once the sexual element is removed, then we're talking about images of generally fully clothed people, not of pornographic nature.

Therefore an image of minor with wet pants is, to me, not sexual in anyway. Just like an image of ugly girl with wet pants or of an ugly girl with dry pants.

Aloo