New Girl on Y/T posting clips wetting her pants

[Patches]

This girl must have just gotten her YouTube account and she has been very busy today posting video clips. She has uploaded 8 of them so far today (November 20, 2012). I think she just discovered how to get people to view her clips: show people that she can wet her pants on camera! She may be right because the 3 wetting clips have more views than her other clips. Check them out for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKZXTpU2fDs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcsynXYOO48
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zN4LbzzYd0

[amaron32]

Good find patches
Any chance you may have saved the first one? The other two work fine as of right now.

[Dusty Harold]

A Good Find

Patches ,
The first video was yanked by You tube , already .
The other two ran just well . I believe the girl in both videos I was able to watch . Within time and some practice at standing in place and not falling down . Might become a real good wetter on camera .

Maybe she slipped and fell in her puddle of pee that she let go of , though , I couldn't tell for sure if she really wet herself . I couldn't see a wet patch on her pants , if she did or not ! !

Really good find there , Patches , you have a keen eye out for some most interesting video clips . That you find on the web these days .

Thank You for posting them and , Please , keep on posting . I find all your web clips very interesting to watch ! !

Though , I still love the videos , you , have made for your website . To top anything out there at present . Give or take a couple of them . Now and again .

Take Care , Patches ! !

Dusty Harold

[Patches]

WTF? Two of the files have now been removed for "violating YouTube's policy on nudity and sexual content." There was no nudity and there was no sexual content. Both clips were pretty tame compared to some of the stuff on YouTube. Maybe the girl's mother caught her, saw she was uploading video clips of her wetting her pants, and filed a complaint with YouTube. I can't imagine any other reason for removing the files. Even the biggest prude on the YouTube fascist review committee would not have had a problem with the content IMHO.

Here are the missing files:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/ymk3iq
http://www.sendspace.com/file/6fqjkq

[amaron32]

Someone once said that everytime you click on a link from a website it that website shows up on the youtube video's stats as a "referral" my guess is that they have a blacklist of referrals and wetset is on that list...

[Patches]

@amaron32
I have heard that conspiracy theory too and it plays right into my usual paranoid state of mind. However, a couple of observations raise doubts about that theory.

First, many direct links from this forum do not result in a Y/T clip being removed. Second, only two of the clips that maxxylover posted were removed. The third clip that I linked to was not removed so any removal is not automatic if there is a link to it from this site. It is possible that a link from this site flags a clip for review. If this is what happens, then there are a lot of differences of opinion among reviewers about what constitutes a violation of Y/T policy since some overtly sexual clips are left online while others (like the ones maxxylover posted) are taken down.

The only two reasons I have ever seen on Y/T about why a clip was removed are either for copyright violations or nudity/sexual content violations. Perhaps there are many other reasons why a clip is removed and the Y/T police only have these 2 graphics they can use in place of where a clip used to be. This is all sheer conjecture and we may never know why certain clips are removed. Personally, I like to believe her mother caught her wetting her pants and uploading clips of her activities. The drama of that happening is fun to imagine. However, we will never know what really happened unless maxxylover tells us on her channel (unless that gets deleted too).

[Dusty Harold]

Good Reasoning

Patches ,
I agree with what you mentioned on this thread . About why certain videos are removed off y/tube . While others remain to be viewed .

I have on many occasions had clicked on a link to a video on Y/tube . Only to find that it had already been removed for some reason , unknown to me . Even some that you had posted here on different threads . Not your fault though . Maybe my timing is off at checking these videos out before they are removed .

I would like to think that in a certain scenario of that girl , in that particular video , we all are discussing here on this thread . Had slipped on the puddle of pee that she had made on the floor ! !

That alerted her Mother in another room . Upon hearing someone falling on the floor . To investigate the mishap and find out who fallen and made such a racket in an adjacent room .

When that girl slipped on that puddle and made a thud upon hitting the floor and then struggling to get up again . Busted ! !

Patches ,again , you , do a great job of posting some interesting links to videos . Worth watching and commenting on ! !

Thank You , for your contributions on here .

Dusty Harold

[xxxxx]

It's this simple: Youtube removes videos it deems to be wetting fetish related in any way, if and when it becomes aware of them.

Youtube are not stupid and have the power of Google's incredible data analysis knowhow behind them. They likely have many, many ways of determining if a clip violates their rules, probably including all the ways we've discussed over the years (flagging, referrer headers, etc).

The bottom line is this, they remove stuff, often and quickly based on undisclosed and vague standards that seem to change with the wind so if you find something that you want to be able to view again in the future, save it.

[Omo Rashi]

I watched all three vids when they were still there - and did not even feel any urge to download them. Yes, they are interesting in a sense: Nice to see a girl who has an interest to do this and to upload it on youtube even at that age already (I guess not older than 14). But no, I do not feel any arousal. I never do with that age group, thank goodness.

She looks nice though, and maybe that mom theory could be true, lol.

There is much hotter stuff on youtube (in our direction) which is allowed to survive. I don't see any strategy by them at all. I am in contact with a fantastic (a little crazy of course) American girl (22) who is really into it and is thrilled by knowing that guys out there watch her wettings, uploaded on youtube. I think she has opened her fifth (at least) youtube account already.

[amaron32]

Are you referring to Kitty(carefulness) by chance? She does have some great videos. I first came across her on Experience Project last year, and its been a lot of ups and downs with her videos but I hope she figures it out. Its good stuff.

[Omo Rashi]

Are you referring to Kitty(carefulness) by chance? She does have some great videos. I first came across her on Experience Project last year, and its been a lot of ups and downs with her videos but I hope she figures it out. Its good stuff.

Yes. Good stuff indeed.

[burningblood97]

I absolutely LOVE real girls who are into our fetish. Especially when they are somewhat attractive, but not too attractive because then it seems unrealistic. This girl falls right into my category of hott, but not too hott.

Some might argue that she might be underage. Here's my 2 cents. If you don't know her age, and she doesn't blatantly look underage, then just assume she's not underage. I know, I know, this can lead to some trouble. But I would rather be unaware that the girl is actually underage and just enjoy the videos.

Now, I'm only 20 years old, so I can get away with this. I can see why some older people here might have a problem with my philosophy. But if she looks like she could possibly be 18+ and you don't know her real age, then who cares if she's underage? What you don't know can't hurt you.

Now, if she were to come forward and blatantly say she's under 18, then yes, the video must, and should be, removed. Also, if the girl clearly looks underage, and you can be 100% sure without even knowing her real age that she's underage, then again, it must be removed. But until you are 100% sure that she's underage, why not just assume or "pretend" that she really is a legal adult? Otherwise, you're missing out on some potentially great wetting material. It's not like our fetish involves nudity, most of the time anyway.

Hell, to be perfectly honest, I wouldn't even care if the girl in a video was 17 or even 16. I wouldn't date a girl that young, but I would certainly fap to her if she wet her pants! Remember, I'm only 20 so that makes it seem okay I guess. I bet when I'm 23 or 24 I wouldn't be as open to seeing a 16 year old wet.

Again, just my 2 cents.

[Dusty Harold]

A Reply

I understand your point of view here , but , let me mention this as a reminder . That it's illegal in the U.S.A. to knowingly view pornography containing any child under the age of 18 . In all 50 States .

Who wants to be convicted of being a child molester ? I don't for one I just Hope that , You Tube , checks and verifies each and every girls age . When they post of there . Their wetting / peeing videos .

So that , You Tube , catches the blame , NOT , an innocent viewer . That happens to be watching . When the Feds come knocking down His / Hers door some night . With an arrest warrant for their arrest .

Being convicted of the crime of viewing / down loading of something that has young under age girls in it . Wetting themselves / peeing in the nude by chance .

My quarter's worth on that .

Dusty Harold

[Razz]

Dusty, is English your first language? I'm just wondering.

[burningblood97]

I understand your point of view here , but , let me mention this as a reminder . That it's illegal in the U.S.A. to knowingly view pornography containing any child under the age of 18 . In all 50 States .

Who wants to be convicted of being a child molester ? I don't for one I just Hope that , You Tube , checks and verifies each and every girls age . When they post of there . Their wetting / peeing videos .

So that , You Tube , catches the blame , NOT , an innocent viewer . That happens to be watching . When the Feds come knocking down His / Hers door some night . With an arrest warrant for their arrest .

Being convicted of the crime of viewing / down loading of something that has young under age girls in it . Wetting themselves / peeing in the nude by chance .

My quarter's worth on that .

Dusty Harold

The key word there is KNOWINGLY. As in, if I don't KNOW she's underage, then it's not illegal.