Test of Y/T clip removal policy

[Patches]

After a quick search on Y/T, I did not find any new clips of guys peeing but I did find a couple of clips posted by the same person of a girl peeing. He has a total of 4 clips and all are recently posted. Here are the two we could use as a test:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCuJH4M3o9g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-i6zUXENOc&list=UL

The person posting these clips is named "WomenPeeing" and he probably reads this forum because he is very defensive of the possibility that Y/T will remove his clips as a violation. Just read his comments about the clips. He posted most of his clips in the last few hours and he just joined Y/T yesterday. Let's see what happens with these clips and if they are removed. If you make a complaint to Y/T about any of these clips, please post that fact here so we get an idea of how many complaints it takes to get a clip removed and if the pleas of the poster have any impact on Y/T's decision.

[Narada]

After a quick search on Y/T, I did not find any new clips of guys peeing but I did find a couple of clips posted by the same person of a girl peeing. He has a total of 4 clips and all are recently posted. Here are the two we could use as a test:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCuJH4M3o9g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-i6zUXENOc&list=UL

The person posting these clips is named "WomenPeeing" and he probably reads this forum because he is very defensive of the possibility that Y/T will remove his clips as a violation. Just read his comments about the clips. He posted most of his clips in the last few hours and he just joined Y/T yesterday. Let's see what happens with these clips and if they are removed. If you make a complaint to Y/T about any of these clips, please post that fact here so we get an idea of how many complaints it takes to get a clip removed and if the pleas of the poster have any impact on Y/T's decision.

These won't be up for long.

[PP1]

Did anyone consider that YT pulls videos that show girls who appear underage in potentiallly sexual context and allows them to stand when the subject is clearly an adult?

[Patches]

Okay, PP1, let's try the test with a couple of clips of obviously underage girls. I am not sure how we test for a "potentially sexual context" but perhaps the first clip below meets that criteria. In the second clip, the girl is obviously a pre-teenager but it is not clear whether she intentionally wets herself or just has an accident.

Just to be clear, I am not in favor of underage girls or boys having clips of themselves being put on Y/T showing them wetting themselves but the clips are there and there are many more of them. I just picked a couple of the more explicit clips to use here as a test to see if being underage with a link from this forum is the criteria Y/T uses for removing a clip.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHOz5yII6Qw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYhsh-MTQPA

[Dusty Harold]

Won't Try

Patches ,
out of what had happened to a close friend of mine . I will obstain from checking those two links you have provided here just recently to check if Y/ T will yank it .

Have you consider the repercussions . Should law enforcement get in involved in those who check these 2 videos out / can you assure me that Wet Set , itself as well as yourself too .

Will not be charged with anything / anything happening for viewing such examples of kiddie porn on here ?

I know this is a test , but , do you know for sure ? Just concerned

Dusty Harold

[Patches]

Dusty,

I do not see either of those links as containing "kiddie porn" because the first link involves a couple of girls just being silly and the second link is in the context of a family event where the whole family is involved in some lighthearted fun.

Besides, both of these clips have been on Y/T for over a year without being removed although the first one is marked as being restricted for adult viewing because of the community standards. If it got that rating, then Y/T has obviously looked at it and determined that it does not violate Y/T policy.

[Dusty Harold]

Dusty,

I do not see either of those links as containing "kiddie porn" because the first link involves a couple of girls just being silly and the second link is in the context of a family event where the whole family is involved in some lighthearted fun.

Besides, both of these clips have been on Y/T for over a year without being removed although the first one is marked as being restricted for adult viewing because of the community standards. If it got that rating, then Y/T has obviously looked at it and determined that it does not violate Y/T policy.

Patches ,
I appreciate that very much in my concerns over what I had stated .What you have just said . Does puts those concerns to rest .

I would hate to see a much respected Friend of mine . To suffer the Fate of what had happened to another friend of mine .

That I had grown up with throughout my life in friendship of him . Now so very tarnished by what he was convicted of doing .

Patches , you have set everything straight on here and I praise you for what you have done . We be doing as well in the future .

I stand in support of what you are trying to prove on testing your theory out about Y/T policies on videos .

Keep it going , MY ULTIMATE MYSTERY WOMAN , I'm behind you 1000%

Go For IT Girl! !

Dust Harold

[Dusty Harold]

Appreciation

Patches ,
Thank You , very much for replying to my PM , that of my questions as well . I do appreciate that very much in what you are doing in giving information . Plus all those wonderful links you post on here .

Yes , to Your question in a way . Plus , I see Texas , not being taken over by any foreign country any time soon !

Just as long as Dusty Harold , rides tall in the saddle on guard as always ! !


Thank You , Patches ! !

A Friend ,

Dusty Harold

[PP1]

On the page for a clip posted here over the weekend, there is soething that should violate YT nudity policy yet it remains open after 2 months. To avoid something that could prompt a pull, I won't name it; but this supports our theory that each monitor/moderator has quite a bit of discretion about wthat to censor.

[Patches]

On the page for a clip posted here over the weekend, there is soething that should violate YT nudity policy yet it remains open after 2 months. To avoid something that could prompt a pull, I won't name it; but this supports our theory that each monitor/moderator has quite a bit of discretion about wthat to censor.

Yes, I know the clip you are referring to. Apparently nudity is acceptable in the right context on Y/T. Do a search on Y/T for "nude art" and you will see what I mean. I agree with you that there is a wide latitude given to moderators about what to censor. They seem to focus more on nudity that promotes lewd and lascivious behavior rather than just banning nudity itself.

[Peevert]

Are you guys gay or something?

I <3 you, Patches.

[krewson28]

it says the video was removed by the user not youtube how are we suposed to see if it gets removed by youtube if its now gone

[Patches]

it says the video was removed by the user not youtube how are we suposed to see if it gets removed by youtube if its now gone

krewson28, users often remove their video clips especially if they get a lot of negative comments from others. I don't know if this is what happened in this case since I have not been monitoring the comments.

What I find interesting out of this whole test is that the 2 clips I identified as being underage girls are still on Y/T. I think the reason may be that they have both been online for several years without getting complaints. If that is so, then a Y/T monitor/moderator is not going to censor them now just because there is a link to them from Wet Set. Y/T seems to remove clips that are recently posted rather than ones which have been on Y/T for a long time even if the content of the old is the same as the new.

At least we have discovered that there isn't any sex bias with Y/T and they will censor both male and female watersports material. The deciding factor on whether something gets yanked or not seems to be how long it has been on Y/T without complaints. What a system!

[Omo Rashi]

So we should open a youtube account and upload a clip on bees and flowers (if that is not too much sex). Then wait 3 years, and you can upload porn as you like.

[Patches]

So we should open a youtube account and upload a clip on bees and flowers (if that is not too much sex). Then wait 3 years, and you can upload porn as you like.

Yes, Omo Rashi, that is the conclusion I am drawing based on what I see Y/T deleting and not deleting. I know it sounds crazy. It is like Occam's razor where the simplest answer, however unlikely, is usually the correct one. Actually, you should probably not wait 3 years. You should keep uploading clips during those 3 years (like maybe some clips with birds as well as bees) and then you can upload porn without having it removed or your account cancelled.