upskirt amateur wettings

[toiletcontroller]

upskirt panty wetting (user has 2 similar clips):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0-i3jOl1XM

[amaron32]

Did you save either of them?

Theyre both gone.

[PP1]

Nice finds. Let's see if these survive. It's pretty clear that the poster isn't going to ask YT to remove them since she's filming herself and posting voluntarily.

[PP1]

Well, they're gone despite not showing any nudity or overt sexual content.

I cut and pasted the link when I viewed the clips. The one with white panties had faint traces of the gal's labia as she peed. This might be construed as "nudity," but in the one with blue panties her genitalia remained obscure.

There's good evience that YT is censoring clips of women wetting their panties. Someone connected with their operation is aware that certain people derive sexual pleasure from doing it or watching another person doing it and wants to deny us the thrill.

[Dusty Harold]

A Suggestion

I hope that , Patches , can Hopefully provide a link to these clips every has mentioned . Though , If they are already removed . She might not be able to help in this situation here on this thread .

Patches , is running a test to see how those at Y/T are watching and censoring certain video clips . That others put up there for others to view .

Please check it out . It should still be in this forum . Post your concerns about these particular videos here to her , for her to continue running that test of hers . That she's proving that Y/T is doing this .

Just a suggestion

Dusty Harold

[PP1]

It's a given that YT scrutinizes the clips posted on their site. There must be thousands per day, so we can assume that a group of people acts as site monitors. Our experience suggests at least some these people believe female wetting can be erotic to posters and viewers. Consequently, they remove such clips very quickly, and we of the kink feel antagonistic especially if we missed out on the clips.

What isn't known and what Patches was trying to find out is whether viewers come to YT via a hyperlink from this board triggers removal of wetting clips or whether the sensibilities of individual monitors results in their removal even if there are no hits from sites with known erotic proclivity. I'm not sure it's a question that can be answered.

[bwetfan]

It's a given that YT scrutinizes the clips posted on their site. There must be thousands per day, so we can assume that a group of people acts as site monitors. Our experience suggests at least some these people believe female wetting can be erotic to posters and viewers. Consequently, they remove such clips very quickly, and we of the kink feel antagonistic especially if we missed out on the clips.

What isn't known and what Patches was trying to find out is whether viewers come to YT via a hyperlink from this board triggers removal of wetting clips or whether the sensibilities of individual monitors results in their removal even if there are no hits from sites with known erotic proclivity. I'm not sure it's a question that can be answered.

Another possibility - there could be a few antagonist wise asses following this board that report violations whenever they see a video, and the randomness of which moderator handles the request comes into play.

They probably do have ways of monitoring traffic that could alert a moderator that action might be needed (including referral tags), but the only way that works is if they have a huge database of suspect sites.

[PP1]

If you're right, as well you might be, there is no way for us to avoid having clips removed. Nevertheless, if the hyperlink theory is valid, it makes sense not to view the YT videos by clicking the links provided here. We've been around that block several times, but some people seem to find it too difficult to open YT then copy and past the link into the search box.

[Patches]

I did not see this thread in time to capture the clips so there is no way I can help provide the clips to anyone else who did not view them. This is one of the reasons it is critical to save any clips before you post a link here. If you don't know how to save them, then send a private message to someone else who is regularly on this forum and provide the link and ask them to save the clip in case it disappears after being posted here.

@bwetfan
I think your theory about why some clips disappear and others don't is the best theory I have heard so far. All it would take is one person coming to this forum who has a direct link to one of the Y/T moderators to cause clips to be randomly removed after a link to them is posted here. Just think, if a moderator is off duty when a link is sent to him, he might not get around to removing it for a while. Or, if it is a clip that has been on Y/T for a year or more and no one has complained about it before, he might just leave it. Whoever is removing clips from Y/T seems to focus on new posters who are just starting to post clips with watersports content.

[Dusty Harold]

A Thought

Patches , that brings to mind a problem I have seen about certain girls being scared off from the Wet Set forum boards ./ Because , someone[s] are attempting to limit the girls from participating on here by posting there own photos & videos as well .

Being Harassed , intimidated to prove to these certain people that they are truly females , who for one reason / another not want to show their faces nor provide a full nude shot of themselves either .

For example , what has been currently happening with a member here by the name of , Wet Cindy. Glance at her threads to see what she had to put up with .

Until certain members rallied to her defense of those insulting posts on her threads .

Just a possible thought of what's happening on Y/ T as well , do you think ?

Dusty Harold

[Drying]

They probably do have ways of monitoring traffic that could alert a moderator that action might be needed (including referral tags), but the only way that works is if they have a huge database of suspect sites.

Not really. They're Google. Data mining is their specialty.
And in this case, it's so easy even I could do it.

Think about it this way. YouTube has to hire a lot of people to moderate videos.
The more sophisticated their software system for automatic blocking and reporting to moderators is, the less money they have to spend on the moderations themselves.