Grab 'em before Y/T deletes them!

[Patches]

Here are perfect candidates for Y/T deletion. The first one is a new post of a girl slowly wetting her shorts. Fans of slow wetting will enjoy this one. Since this girl is new to Y/T and only has one other video uploaded (which only lasts 1 second), this is a perfect candidate for Y/T removal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oNNphLOas0

Here is the second candidate for deletion. It is from a first time uploader who posted his first clip today. He posted a spycam clip from pisshunters of a girl peeing under a bridge. While other skycam clips manage to stay on Y/T, they are not usually close up and clear like this clip and since it is from a new poster, well, you know... POOF!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFhW15XkDSs

[kapulas]

YT already took 2nd one down

Bummer. First one was good though. Nice find.

[Patches]

Well, that deletion didn't take long... less than an hour! Never fear... the clip is not lost. You can get it at:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/m5v93j

Remember, only click on the link where it says "Click here to start download from sendspace" or else you will get junk you don't want on your computer!

[Omo Rashi]

Nice finde, thank you! Although I am very much into desperation and wetting, in this case I prefer the second clip: a very attractive woman. It was of course wise to save it before mentioning the link here. These mentally disturbed youtube policemen should seek medical treatment for their psychic disease.

[Dusty Harold]

Patches ,
Again you have some wonderful links to test . Though , again Y/T is also still removing them . The first one was Excellent find . I thoroughly enjoyed watching it . It was Marvelous in the style she had done it . Nice & slow , mostly in the front as well . Mmmmmmm ............

The second one was removed by the time I had checked out . Though will try to see it by the link you supplied .

Thanks , Patches , You're doing well ! !

Dusty Harold

[kochel428]

Patches, if you're doing experiments like this, shouldn't there be a non-wetting video link as well? We're trying to find out if linking from WetSet is causing things to be deleted, right? We need a video that no human would choose to delete, but a robot would if it's based on referrals.

[Patches]

Patches, if you're doing experiments like this, shouldn't there be a non-wetting video link as well? We're trying to find out if linking from WetSet is causing things to be deleted, right? We need a video that no human would choose to delete, but a robot would if it's based on referrals.

kochel428, you may have a point that I had not thought of. Actually, I posted these links not as a test but with the full expectation that Y/T would delete both of them. Let me see if I can find a clip that would be suitable for the test you suggest. I think it should be a clip by a new poster since that is what gets removed the quickest and perhaps it should include the word "pee" in the subject. It shouldn't be too hard to find one like that since I have seen quite a few new posters use the word "pee" in their subject when the clip actually had nothing to do with pee. I think they do that in an effort to try to get a lot of views so their clip appears to be popular.

If anyone else has any thoughts on the best way to test to see if robots or humans are doing the deleting, post them here.

[Dusty Harold]

A Thought

Patches ,
I was wondering if there was / were certain moderators on Y/T that had something against Wet Set . Having links from Y/T to this set . That they recognized and then censure . Because they don't like this web site linking to Y/ T accounts so often . That show wetting / pee videos on there .

Though a thought . I just wanted to add it .

If this has already been posted on , I wasn't aware of it being done before .

Dusty Harold

[Patches]

I came close to finding a new poster who uses the word "pee" in the subject heading and has content that no human would remove but a robot might. In the process, I found 2 more clips that fall under the heading of this thread to "Grab'em before Y/T deletes them." Actually most of you may not want to grab them because they are clips of an 11 year old boy first struggling to pee in his underpants and then another clip of the same 11 year old boy shitting in his pants. However, they are funny to watch and Y/T is sure to delete them very soon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8XOE8L1f9A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbBAkMcoFLU

Okay, start your timer! Let's see how fast they disappear!

[Dusty Harold]

I came close to finding a new poster who uses the word "pee" in the subject heading and has content that no human would remove but a robot might. In the process, I found 2 more clips that fall under the heading of this thread to "Grab'em before Y/T deletes them." Actually most of you may not want to grab them because they are clips of an 11 year old boy first struggling to pee in his underpants and then another clip of the same 11 year old boy shitting in his pants. However, they are funny to watch and Y/T is sure to delete them very soon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8XOE8L1f9A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbBAkMcoFLU

Okay, start your timer! Let's see how fast they disappear!

Patches , They were still running when I checked both links this morning ,
[ My Time U.S. ] , at 8;30 am .

Make not take much longer for Y/T to delete them . We must continue checking .

Dusty Harold

[lykquid]

Slow wetting

Do you have the link to download that one. It is gone and I did not see a link for download. Is it a girl in yellow shorts because I may have already seen it and might have it downloaded.

[Patches]

Here is the clip of the girl slow peeing in yellow shorts:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/o6cxs2

[w1cked]

Great find! Cheers Patches!