Y/T clips

[Patches]

It has been rather quiet around this forum for a while so I thought it might be fun to spice it up with some new Y/T wetting clips. Someone calling himself or herself "CentralVideoTube" has been very busy today uploading a lot of clips of both men and women peeing. You can see the full list at http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMC39bzfnIiuwF3d5BKjWfg

However, here are some of the more interesting ones that I do not believe are repeats:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPFXMIDJ40w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGtYVUHZsc0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBur_QpdtKE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSs9BtdoFQI

EDIT: I removed the third link because some were offended by it. I never thought it was erotic. I thought it was cute or as I said originally of all the links, they are interesting. If you look around Y/T, you can even find clips of toddlers peeing and wetting themselves. Apparently Y/T has no problem with that and some of them are cute to watch also although I have to wonder why some parent or babysitter would make a clips of a toddlers wetting themselves and post it on Y/T.

[Dusty Harold]

Amusing Videos

Patches ! ,

Good to see you once again on here . To liven things up a bit . With what you have found on the great World Wide Web Of Peeing Videos , for all of our viewing pleasure and amusement
Ifound most of them amusing in what was being said than being done in most of them ! Though the last one I viewd . Was a good one . That showed the girl approaching the camera . With her hands in covering Her crotch . As She got closer to the camera . To pause long enough to uncover Her crotch , spread Her legs some and allow the camera . To get a very Excellent view of Her wet patch on Her shorts that she peed through
Now that was Fantastic to see and I really enjoyed watching all the videos You had given links to on here . By sharing all those . I do appreciate what you had found and then posted on here , for others too . To enjoy watching . Then Hopefully comment / compliment you on what you have
found on the web to enjoy on here

Thank You

Dusty Harold

P.S. I might even check out what else the video maker has filmed as well .

[Razz]

Not that I care or that there's anyone on this dead forum anymore anyway but some here will get bent out of shape about that third link.

[Opal]

ummmm.

In not sure what to say about this place, I've been coming to this site since the turn of the century and I hadn't really noticed that we were all in favour of watching videos of minors.

What the hell.

Surely we are better than this.

[Dusty Harold]

In not sure what to say about this place, I've been coming to this site since the turn of the century and I hadn't really noticed that we were all in favour of watching videos of minors.

What the hell.

Surely we are better than this.

True , We are . Though slip ups do occur. NOTE ; that particular video doesn't contain any nudity . Like some of the rest do at times . Since this young girl only wet herself . Without showing any nudity at all. I would suppose that this video is permitted to be seen on here . I believe , Patches , wouldn't have added it , if it crossed the line , in any form of kiddie porn nor would Wet Set have permitted either . Had it had any thing close to that subject So I feel safe at viewing it ,if there are more negative comments on this particular subject . I believe .Patches could remove the link , if so politely asked to do so. Though I see no reason at the moment . That She should . Because it hasn't crossed the line in being exploitative at all ! { My Opinion }

Dusty Harold

[Opal]

Hazy definitions

You're probably right in what you say, legally a video of a kid wetting her pants isn't likely to be classed as pornographic, but then again the legal definition is a little fuzzy. The general attitude toward the definition is this:

"Pornography
The representation in books, magazines, photographs, films, and other media of scenes of sexual behavior that are erotic or lewd and are designed to arouse sexual interest." †

I know that these videos do not contain nudity or what is commonly perceived as sexual behaviour but we are not common, we are all here, I am assuming, because we share a sexual interest in the subjects this site concerns its self with.

When viewed from this website, which says on it front page, "Wet Set Magazine covers the subjects of panty wetting, knicker wetting, accidents, adult babies, bedwetting, panty pooping, poopy diapers, golden showers, role playing and wearing diapers and nappies in a sexual context."‡ the videos we seek out and view and share with each other are being shared with the intent of providing sexual arousal, we are, by design, arousing our sexual interest. For me that is close enough to the definition of pornography to cause concern.

As for whether or not there was any exploitation of the child involved with the video is another argument, I would agree that there was no direct exploitation of a child this time, but where does this lead to? Watching children in a context we have defined as sexual is one step in a seriously bad direction.

I strongly believe in an absolute zero tolerance policy when it comes to children appearing in the videos we are linking to.


With regards to Patches's edit, first of all, thank you for the changes, its nice to be listened to, and secondly, I can appreciate images of children wetting are not necessarily being viewed in an erotic manor and that they may be interesting in more innocent ways, I just think this is the wrong place to share that particular interest.


† http://legal-dictionary.thefreedicti...om/pornography

‡ http://www.wetset.net

[wiseguy]

The more salient point is that it CAN be perceived as a little iffy by legal authorities, so if you were caught with that kind of stuff on your computer, you would likely be arrested. Let's draw a line between arrest and conviction because those are two different things. So while the whole "no nudity, no porn" argument might eventually get a really good lawyer to help you become acquitted of all charges, and thus not be convicted, that will only happen after you've already been dragged through the legal system under SUSPICION of child pornography. And that will take several months. Cops are not lawyers, nor are they philosophers.

[Vic]

Thanks for removing the 3rd link. A video of giggly pre-teens (though originally posted as innocent humor on youtube) has absolutely NO business being anywhere on a website dedicated to adult eroticism.
My 2 cents- Vic

[Major Travis]

In not sure what to say about this place, I've been coming to this site since the turn of the century and I hadn't really noticed that we were all in favour of watching videos of minors.

What the hell.

Surely we are better than this.

So what you're saying is that you've made two posts in the last 13 years, contributing nothing whatsoever to the site, until someone posts something you don't like, and then you come out shrieking like a banshee and pointing fingers?

I'm not the board owner and I am not a lawyer, so I am not qualified to make statements about whether or not the video was legal/appropriate/within the rules/whatever. The link has been removed regardless, so it is a moot point.

What is not a moot point is that you are the worst and most annoying sort of leeching, lurking, selfish board member. The type who never adds ANYTHING to the board. No content, no stories, no videos, no discussion, no photos, NOTHING. Until you decide it is time to bestir yourself on your moral high horse and start criticizing posters who actually make contributions to the community.

Not to mention that unless you are a filthy liar as well, and the birthdate of 1985 that you have listed in your profile is correct, then you were 15 years old and a MINOR yourself when you started visiting this site 'at the turn of the century.' So a hypocrite to boot. What, it is perfectly fine for you to break the rules and spend time flogging yourself dizzy on an 'adult erotic website' when you're a teenybopper, but someone posts a completely innocent, nudity-free, non-sexual video of a different minor and you are suddenly righteously enraged and indignant?

Useless tit. Go back to whatever hole you crawled out of and stfu for another 13 years. No one here is interested in your hypocritical complaining.

[Opal]

Great post, few questions though...

I like your vigor, Major, well done, good show. There are a few things I'd a like to clear up though.


How does the assumed frequency and volume of my posts relate to the validity of my point?

Who am I pointing fingers at?

I sure didn't want to come off as "shrieking like a banshee," I was going for a more serious tone, since the subject is so serious, I'd love to know where I went wrong. What exactly is the difference between serious and "shrieking like a banshee?"

You're right the link has been removed, but I must admit I am at a loss here, how is this a "moot point?" I mean I am calling into question whether or not dipictions of wettings - something we have defined as a sexual thing for us - that involve children should be posted, whether or not it is legal, right or wrong, or even sensible.

I'd like to take this opportunity to apologise for being the "worst and most annoying sort of leeching, lurking, selfish board member." I'm sorry everyone. I am a little confused though, curse my feeble brain, but what is it that makes me the "worst and most annoying sort of leeching, lurking, selfish board member?" Is it the assumption that I have posted "no content, no stories, no videos, no discussion, no photos, NOTHING?"

Well I ought to apologise for that too I guess, I take it I haven't met my monthly quota of content posting. I never knew there were rules against this and I will happily take my punishment.

I don't mean to dissapoint you, but I am no filthy liar, I am 28, and as a for that 15 year old boy I used to be, who'd discovered his strange tastes, years previously, and came across this website and found people who felt the same way and, well, suddenly that young man didn't feel so bad about himself anymore, he particularly regretted seeking solice from a school friend, but that's another story. (I'd like to thank the people, burried sadly in my memory, and the board in general, I doubt anyone here remembers any of what was said between us, but that's ok' it was a long time ago.) I was, not incredabily so but some, active for a while I talked with people about things and I posted photos of my girl friend at the time. I have been away for years and my life has changed dramatically and for personal reasons I am having a fresh start. I am sorry to have offended you so.


Sorry, got side tracked, silly of me. How am I a hypocrite? I mean if I had my own forum and allowed content of children on there, and I came here and said what I have said then yes, I get it, I'd be a hypocrite. It's just that a youngster looking at 18+ images is not the same as, say, a grown man or woman looking at images of a youngster, is it just me or are they not actually two different things?


You are right on another count, yet again, I got to admit, I did break the rules all those years ago, the site asked me if I was 18, or an adult as defined by my community, it was clear as day and I lied, I entered anyway. I'm sorry for that, I did not think what the ramifications would have been for the owners of this site had I been discovered. I'm sorry.

I do feel bad though, really I do, but I'd like to let you know that I am not enraged in the least, I'm so sorry that that's how I came of and that it, as it seems to have done to me anyway, to have upset you so much. As for indignant, well aren't we all, from time to time.

The last thing I'd like to say about all this nonsense is about the proverbial moral high horse. She's no calm old mare, she's a wild bucking bronco and we should all strive to get on up there and hold on for as long as we can, because mud sticks.

And finally something of actual importance:

I just think that the subject of policy for underage content warrants farther discussion, because we are all telling each other how good an innocent these things are but who's to say that none of us are lying. What about all those lurkers?


Kind regards,
Useless tit.