MOre wetting than we think?? (topic for discussion)

[Maria]

I get a lot of PM's from women who lurk but are afraid to actually post on fetish boards, and I don't know about women 20-30, but for those who like "red-hot MILF's" and "sexy soccer moms," I can assure you that wet panties are a lot more common than you might think among that crowd. I have also heard from any number of women whose post-natal "stress incontinence" has caused their previously "vanilla" husbands to get a big and completely unexpected stiffy. Result: Stress incontinence becomes a source of marital fun and games for couples in that age group.

And as one who is in that group, I can say yeah, dresses and skirts make it a lot easier to give the boyfriend a thrill in public without being noticed -- esp. skirts and dresses that are loose. The tight ones are risky.

Just sayin'.

[Peevert]

Skirt peeing, and a woman using it to hide the fact that she has peed her panties, has always been a fascination of mine. Wee, Maria, thank you for your comments.

[Dusty Harold]

Very Good Thoughts

I get a lot of PM's from women who lurk but are afraid to actually post on fetish boards, and I don't know about women 20-30, but for those who like "red-hot MILF's" and "sexy soccer moms," I can assure you that wet panties are a lot more common than you might think among that crowd. I have also heard from any number of women whose post-natal "stress incontinence" has caused their previously "vanilla" husbands to get a big and completely unexpected stiffy. Result: Stress incontinence becomes a source of marital fun and games for couples in that age group.

And as one who is in that group, I can say yeah, dresses and skirts make it a lot easier to give the boyfriend a thrill in public without being noticed -- esp. skirts and dresses that are loose. The tight ones are risky.

Just sayin'.

Maria ,
Appreciate that insight . It was most interesting . I have always been aroused by the way women can relieve themselves in that manner
The thoughys that are provoked are of many Fantasies of mine

Thank You , In sharing your thoughts on here .

Dusty Harold

[Adrian6970]

I think it's perhaps fair to say that most people have accidents - at least occasionally - during adult life. However the proportion of the population who actually admit to it isn't large and the number of those who concede that they actually enjoy it is smaller still.

[Peevert]

Well said.

[moosehead68]

Pauly Peeps is a man...just thought ya might like to know lol.

[Peevert]

What does that have to do with this thread?

[Patches]

What does that have to do with this thread?

moosehead68 is making a subtle insult toward Dusty Harold because Dusty made a recommendation for people to do a Google search on Pauly Peeps and that this was a girl he exchanged messages with about her enjoyment of wetting.

moosehead68 knows that if he makes any more direct attacks against Dusty Harold (or anyone else), he will likely be banned from this forum. He has been warned multiple times not to attack or insult other members of this forum but he must feel it is his personal responsibility to attack Dusty Harold every chance he gets. Just because moosehead68 posts the truth doesn't mean it is not an insult.

To end this potential conflict right here, let me just say to Dusty that you should do a thorough search on Pauly Peeps and you will discover as moosehead68 has unkindly pointed out that Pauly Peeps in indeed a man!

[Dusty Harold]

The Truth Is Out There

I stand corrected . I know that I'm not perfect in all things . When I take something as factual . When in fact it's a falsehood . meant to decieve others into believeing it to be true . I have always feared that with the technicology that exists out there on the inter net / computer . That it has made it much easier to fool someone into believing what one sees , hears , reads and takes a factual . To then find out it was a total falsehood.
How then can you take anything Now A Days at face value . When it's so damn easy to be mislead at times . Where is there Honesty & Truth !
In matters concerning the inter net and what is currently out there to
decieve as well as to mislead. Where then is the reality that all things are based on . In being the truth and not a lie nor a false hood ! !
Except in the increase in knowledge , Wisdom and the Understanding . That at present times now . We all must be aware of what's out there . To easily mis direct us at times ! !

I at times feel defeated in what I know and what I need to know . To exist on the inter net today . That I do appreciate the information . That , Patches , has given me in regards to said , Pauly Peeps .

That of the stern warning to moosehead68 . That as I have said in another post & thread on here before . About you insulting me . I will again will state this to YOU ! Moosehead68 that what ever you say against me . Makes you appear much more ignorant and less likely to be a respected member of these Forums on here . Keep on doing what you think is right to do . In putting me down and you will find less friends on here in respecting you as a member in good standing , but , in putting you in very dim view of those . You wish to impress with your insults ! Rather they are the Truth or Not ! !
END OF LINE ...............................

Dusty Harold

[Betanumeric]

You asked for links to published research...

Almost all medical research with hard numbers - particularly a breakdown of the numbers by age - is behind paywalls owned by academic journals.

However, the proceedings of the International Consultation on Incontinence *are* in the public domain, and they have a chapter on 'how much of this is out there?' with statistics and links to deeper research:

Chapter 3 - Epidemiology and Natural History of Incontinence
http://www.ics.org/publications/ici_...ers/Chap03.pdf


Skip down to section 4, on page 176, where the statistics for adult women begin.


Here's the best summary, cutting across several published surveys, of incontinence in women in the 20-30 age bracket:

http://www.uib.no/isf/people/doc/epidem.htm


You'll find numbers in the range 10.5% to 13.5% for this, in similar surveys, in the 20-20 age group: the catch is the definition of incontinence, because it isn't 'any loss', it's losses that are sufficiently bothersome for a diagnosis of incontinence.


The difficult data - 'any loss' - keeps getting taken down. However, the Nordic countries insist on publicly-funded medical data being publicly available, so here goes:


[Prevalence of urinary incontinence among young female college students.]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16819073

"About one third (32%) reported some urinary incontinence during the past four weeks"

There's more out there, but you need to keep looking. I recommend the search terms 'Urinary Incontinence" + Prevalence + Incidence + "Younger Women"

[Paul Tester]

Maria.
Back to your comment about peeing under your skirt at a festival.
Did you set out prepared to do this or was it forced on you by circumstances? (inadequate access to toilets, etc.)
Do you dress so as to make it easier to pee down your legs or do you make the best of it when you have to?
This has long ben one of my fantasies: that a Lady would go out deliberately thinking that she would have to pee down her legs, and thus take care to dress so as to make that easier. e.g. wear a skirt that would not get in the way and be stained by pee; wear underwear that would allow pee to flow through easily and not spray everywhere; underwear that would dry quickly.
What if you have to wear jeans? Does that mean that you have to hold your pee, or do you chose a pair that will not show the pee too much? White or black jeans come to mind, but my experience is that in good light it still shows.

How many ladies go out to events where peeing might be restricted thinking that they will have to go down their legs and dress so they can.
How many doubt their ability to wait and think along these lines.
I admit to suffering from"Dress envy" in circumstances where I cannot find somewhere to pee think how easy it would be to pee down my legs if I was a lady wearing a skirt.

[Maria]

I am a fetishist. I do it on purpose. My bf gets a really stiff dick when grown women wet their pants, so we are on the same page about it. I would never do it in an indoor or urban setting, only at fairs and events which take place in parks or someplace where I can duck behind a tree. the bf stands watch.

When we are going to a place like that, as for example when we went to the "strawberry festival" at the public park a couple of weekends ago, I am likely to put on my big old white nylon full briefs, don a knee length loose skirt, and whisper to my bf that I just might be in the mood to make him very happy today. If circumstances are right -- I mean that the whole vibe just has to "feel right" -- I slip behind a tree, part my legs, and let go while he keeps guard by standing in front of me so that I cannot be very clearly seen behind my tree. Only he knows that I am wet. We do have a naughty little fantasy that someday a guy will sneak up behind me, lift my dress, and get a big surprise when he sees my wet underwear. Of course that will never happen, but the fantasy makes both of us really horny. If you asked me, "But do you honestly wish that something like that would happen?" the truth is yes, I do.

As for jeans, no way. There seems to be a prevalent fantasy on this message board that no one will notice anything if you are wearing black jeans. Some years ago, when I was twenty-something and had just moved from my little suburb to the Big City, I used to hang out in clubs with an art school crowd that was into Goth bands and lots of kink. I was dating a guy who was just totally fascinated by kink in general, and when I told him about my little fetish he kept urging me to "express myself." One night I did precisely that. I hate to burst anyone's bubble, but black jeans don't conceal a damn thing. Everyone will still know that you did it in your pants. Exciting in a certain way to "come out of the water closet" and be revealed in public as a pervert, but not something I am ever likely to do again.

[DeltaFoxtrot]

Try black nylon pants instead of jeans.

My wife has a pair as part of her work outfit and inadvertently found out the other week that they are completely waterproof.

[Paul Tester]

Maria,
Thanks for the frank reply. My fantasies have always been about a lady in skirts wetting or peeing down her legs.
Perhaps Lycra/wet look shorts or pedal pushers might look as if the wet will not show, but I doubt that. Wash a pair and see how the colour/ texture looks different.
I don't want to describe it now, but I have witnessed a lady in white jeans wetting in public, and even from 10ft(3m.) away, the difference was easily seen. I spotted it when I was only looking at her because she had a nice bum, and no idea that she was wetting. What happened when she sat down on a dusty or dirty seat, I have no idea as I lost sight of her soon after. Moral is: don't try wetting in white denim. It shows.
The Victorians were experts at peeing down their legs, they didn't have anywhere else to go, and they all wore full skirts with layers of underskirts. It might have been the fashion, but it also let them pee when they needed to

[Omo Rashi]

Pauly Peeps is a man...just thought ya might like to know lol.

Patches confirmed this.

I would not be surprised. But, on the other hand, where do you know this from? Or is there any evidence other than "private conviction"?