Tweet
Yesterday I posted this link, which I think was both new and relevant, but for some reason it was removed. I emailed wetset asking why, but I didn't get any response. Maybe it was removed by mistake. I hope it stays this time, or that I get some sort of explanation if there was something wrong with my posting it, because I was truly mystified why it disappeared.
A cute girl deliberately pisses her pants in a store aisle: [link deleted]
Explanation from Patches: I deleted your link yesterday and today because other websites with clips of this girl refer to her as being 13 or 14 years old. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with this clip. In fact, I have been guilty of posting links in the past to under aged girls because I thought the contents were "cute" and wanted to share the clip with this community. However, Wet Set sponsors this forum and they have a firm rule which says, "3) There will be no posts about minors or links to underage material." I believe this rule exists to avoid any legal problems resulting from links to clips of minors from a website which promotes peeing and wetting as sexual activities even if the actual clip does not contain anything sexual. While I don't personally see anything wrong with the clip you linked to, I understand Wet Set's position of wanting to avoid any legal problems arising from promoting the "prurient interests" of this fetish community by the activities of minors. Other websites like YouTube can host and offer exactly the same content depicting minors but they are different because they are not a fetish community with an interest in peeing and wetting. Is this a double standard? Most definitely!
Since Wet Set made me an administrator on this forum, I need to enforce the rules they have set up for the practices on this forum. I am doing the best I can. If you don't agree with my decision, you are welcome to appeal my decision to Paul Compton at support@wetset.net and let him make the final decision on the matter. It won't bother me if I am overruled because I will learn something in the process. Also, let me add that I have nothing against you and I recognize you as a long time contributor to this forum and I see you as a valued member here.
A cute girl deliberately pisses her pants in a store aisle: [link deleted]
Explanation from Patches: I deleted your link yesterday and today because other websites with clips of this girl refer to her as being 13 or 14 years old. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with this clip. In fact, I have been guilty of posting links in the past to under aged girls because I thought the contents were "cute" and wanted to share the clip with this community. However, Wet Set sponsors this forum and they have a firm rule which says, "3) There will be no posts about minors or links to underage material." I believe this rule exists to avoid any legal problems resulting from links to clips of minors from a website which promotes peeing and wetting as sexual activities even if the actual clip does not contain anything sexual. While I don't personally see anything wrong with the clip you linked to, I understand Wet Set's position of wanting to avoid any legal problems arising from promoting the "prurient interests" of this fetish community by the activities of minors. Other websites like YouTube can host and offer exactly the same content depicting minors but they are different because they are not a fetish community with an interest in peeing and wetting. Is this a double standard? Most definitely!
Since Wet Set made me an administrator on this forum, I need to enforce the rules they have set up for the practices on this forum. I am doing the best I can. If you don't agree with my decision, you are welcome to appeal my decision to Paul Compton at support@wetset.net and let him make the final decision on the matter. It won't bother me if I am overruled because I will learn something in the process. Also, let me add that I have nothing against you and I recognize you as a long time contributor to this forum and I see you as a valued member here.