Has Anyone Here Read a New Law To Be Enforced Soon

[Dusty Harold]

Hi Everyone !!

Has anyone read about a new law passed in the U.K. aimed at not allowing any pee porn to be purchased nor even made in the U.K. ?
That of how it might effect pee websites there in the U.K. as well ?
Any new information on this event . Please , add it here . For all of us to be informed of it & how it might effect us all . In our enjoyment in viewing pee porn . That of having fun with it as well .

Dusty harold

[Percival]

I don't think it ever was legal. I doubt it will make any difference.

[Lloyd_R1]

It simply amazes me that society classes urolagnia in the same category as beastiality, etc. I have wondered over the years whether it's to do with people thinking it's something "infantile" with all the other connotations that brings.

Vanillas are so ordinary!!

[desp k]

What?...................................?

[Hiddenpleasure]

This will only make this fetish even more irressistable.

[PottyDance]

Strange how a society can staunchly defend the rights of sexual minorities like gays, lesbians and the transgendered one day. The next day that very same society condemns other sexual minorities (like fetish communities).

As long as the interest involves consenting adults in a non-coercive, non-exploitative, mutually respectful relationship, there should be no double standard.

[Percival]

Strange how a society can staunchly defend the rights of sexual minorities like gays, lesbians and the transgendered one day. The next day that very same society condemns other sexual minorities (like fetish communities).

As long as the interest involves consenting adults in a non-coercive, non-exploitative, mutually respectful relationship, there should be no double standard.

Probably because there are a significant number of gay people voting.

I think the 'justification' is that it's potentially harmful (also banned are breath-play, fisting and things like whipping and caning), but that doesn't explain why female ejaculation is banned, but male ejaculation isn't. It also doesn't explain why it's fine to show dangerous sports or violence not involving sex.

It's pointless anyway as the servers outside the UK will host the material instead.

[prawnboy]

I pee and I vote

Does this mean its time for an "I Pee and I Vote" campaign?

[desp_fan]

You Bri-ish are quick to ban everything you don`t like but then eventually comes the time something you do like gets plugged. How does that feel?

[DeltaFoxtrot]

Big Brother UK is already punishing thought crimes, why not add this to the list?

[Percival]

You Bri-ish are quick to ban everything you don`t like but then eventually comes the time something you do like gets plugged. How does that feel?

I'm not really sure what any of this actually means!

[Omo Rashi]

Strange how a society can staunchly defend the rights of sexual minorities like gays, lesbians and the transgendered one day. The next day that very same society condemns other sexual minorities (like fetish communities).

This is not strange at all. It is sheer lobbyism. We do not live in a society with freedom of thought any longer. For example, if my opinion were that gay people should have a choice of medical treatment if they themselves should wish so, then I could not express this thought without being condemned as homophob, probably ultra-right wing and christian fundamentalist, presumably worse than Isis. I do not exaggerate. What I observe is that the spirit of our times is dictatorship by lobbies. As long as the gays' lobby was weak, it was even against the law to live out a homosexual disposition.

So why not establish, for example, a form of partnership of three or four or even more people of arbitrary gender (if this word is still allowed) if they all love each other? Today such a proposal would be banned immediately. But wait until a lobby for this has been formed which is strong enough. Then people will suddenly not understand how one can have a different opinion at all. Similarly, if my dog loves me, why not marry him?, or her? Today we think this can only be a joke. But instrumentalize science (as has been done in the case of homosexuality) to find out that a group matrimony is perfectly ok, or that zoophilia is perfectly ok, and find enough support in the mass media and in politics - and you will see that our way of thinking of today will be viewed as completely incomprehensible in future days.

Being a scientist myself, I know that proofs as required are no problem. By making jobs for scientists scarce, research groups will certainly find out what influential people want to hear, even in physics and biology. Yes, nuclear power stations are not risky, we can control them completely, don't worry. Yes, people are born to make their choice of their gender, enjoy your liberty. Yes, the European Union in its present form is the only thinkable way (which may be derived from iron laws of economy). If you have any doubts, you are most likely a nationalistic dumbass, too stupid to understand the most obvious facts. These are our times. Intolerance of lobbies rules. The stamp which says "scientifically proved" is important, being a synonym for "absolutely true, not allowing the tiniest doubt".

So, involve science to prove that pee play in general (and, in particular, wetting oneself) is a completely normal human tendency, and develop political parties which find this interesting, let certain well-known people publicly pee their pants (as has already happened in the case of some president in South America) - and you will see that we will be accepted everywhere. The problem is, currently this is not (yet) the case. But until 40 years ago, the gays would have said the same. So there is still hope. Maybe not for us, but for one of the next generations certainly.

[Paul Tester]

Can anyone post the details of the law? Us British would like to know what we can do.
I thought that Pee related topics were already banned; remember the prosecution of Cascade magazine a few years back?
One trouble with our fetish is that not enough people will admit to liking it, so there is no public opinion in our favour. I bet if there was a survey on this, the majority of "Middle England" would recoil in horror and describe it as disgusting. Politicians do not care about the principle of freedom only winning votes, and unfortunately there are no votes in pee fetish or the like.
Is anyone British here going to write to their MP and complain??
I'm not; I would rather keep quiet and no have a visit from the porn squad.

[Freeflow]

I certainly hope this doesn't pass. It might affect one of my favorite sites, Sneaky Pee.

[Patches]

Being in the USA, I don't know much about British law. However, my impression is that the British legal system has relaxed its prosecution of possession of pee related materials. I say this because I remember back in the late 90's that when we sent video tapes to anyone in the UK, we would remove the tape from the video cassette and carefully seal the tape in a package that was smaller than the size of the video cassette. Since the postal inspectors were looking for packages that might contain video cassettes, they would not open smaller packages for inspection. We supplied instructions to the customer on how to put the tape back inside a video cassette so they could play it after they received it. Later, in the early 2000's, we no longer needed to take these precautions because the postal authorities no longer cared about intercepting adult material or watersports videos in particular. Now that video producers have moved to DVD, there is never a concern about sending watersports material through the mail. We can freely send watersports video on DVD to places it was once prohibited like the UK, New Zealand, and Canada. The only places where we still have to be cautious are Singapore, Arab countries, and to any US Armed Forces serving in Arab countries (because packages have to go through customs in those Arab nations even through the recipient is an American service man).

The latest sign I have seen of some acceptance of the pee fetish in the US is a new series on Showtime called "Sex with Sunny Megatron." The opening of each show gives a list of topics they will be covering and in that list you will find "watersports" and "adult babies." They haven't treated those topics yet because there have only been 5 episodes in series 1 so far. I keep watching to see how they will treat watersports. I expect it will get more treatment than the old HBO series called "Real Sex" which had brief mentions of watersports a couple of times but no real focus on it.

Personally, I am optimistic that watersports will gain general public acceptance in many countries just like BDSM and other fetishes. Laws against such things will be relaxed or not enforced. Anyway, I am hopeful this is the direction things are going and that we won't see any renewed legal opposition to watersports activity.