As a guy, I've probably spent far, far too much time considering this. I've probably watched more women pee than most urologists over the past 15 or so years (at least in video). I've noticed a few problems the ladies have that we guys don't in relieving ourselves outside of a proper toilet. First, a few very fortunate women can reliably shoot a straight, steady stream forward or back while standing. A lot of women, even if they squat, either pee all over their crotch and legs, or splash their feet. The other problem is our repressive laws in the West, where it's preferable to wet one's pants than it is to just discretely relieve yourself when no restroom is readily available. Most places it's a misdemeanor called "Indecent Exposure", or "Public Urination", although (mostly in the very repressed U. S., and mostly for men) it's a major sex offense that can get a guy put on the registered sex offender list for life! Anyway, guys can usually relieve themselves more discretely than women can. Yes, I've seen the funnels that supposedly allow women to "pee like a man". I've been told by a woman who tried one that all she got was a wet hand for her trouble.
So, I'm thinking that with modern fabrics, it ought to be possible to design a panty using water-repellent, and water-resistant fabrics to channel urine in a reliable, focused stream, slightly forward and away, without leaving wet panties. This way, a woman in need could just step discretely into an alley, woods, or shadows, slightly lift her skirt (probably won't work with pants), and pee away without making a mess. Comments?
So, I'm thinking that with modern fabrics, it ought to be possible to design a panty using water-repellent, and water-resistant fabrics to channel urine in a reliable, focused stream, slightly forward and away, without leaving wet panties. This way, a woman in need could just step discretely into an alley, woods, or shadows, slightly lift her skirt (probably won't work with pants), and pee away without making a mess. Comments?
Comment