Hi Patches,
Thanks for posting.
Yes, it's too poor quality to be sure. I think what happens at the time you say is that she briefly pulls her panties aside and the darkness is the video encoder's best attempt at showing her public hair, not a wet patch. She later pulls her panties down, which gives a better view, and does the splits. When she does that and at the end of the video when she has moved aside you can see the floor and there is no evidence of drops or a little puddle, which there probably would be if you did a few spurts in thin panties. But it's patterened floor tiles so, again, too poor quality to be sure.
It would help if anyone is able to translate what she says at the end. She's showing pictures of people (missing?) but then ends up showing amounts of money in US dollars on her body, so not sure what this is about.
Thanks for posting.
Yes, it's too poor quality to be sure. I think what happens at the time you say is that she briefly pulls her panties aside and the darkness is the video encoder's best attempt at showing her public hair, not a wet patch. She later pulls her panties down, which gives a better view, and does the splits. When she does that and at the end of the video when she has moved aside you can see the floor and there is no evidence of drops or a little puddle, which there probably would be if you did a few spurts in thin panties. But it's patterened floor tiles so, again, too poor quality to be sure.
It would help if anyone is able to translate what she says at the end. She's showing pictures of people (missing?) but then ends up showing amounts of money in US dollars on her body, so not sure what this is about.
Comment