Would you...

[steve]

I have a question! I've convinced my girlfriend (20) to do some wetting for online. Understandably, she doesn't want to show her face, but quite willing to get her knickers very wet.

Are people generally interested in buying videos/images without seeing a face...ie in a kittykat mask or similar?

And if so, what do you generally expect to pay for images / videos?

Thank you for any replies.

[DeltaFoxtrot]

Personally, I'd suggest you take a look at what is available from various ameteurs and professionals on **********. You can generally tell the successful shops from the unsuccessful ones. Do what they do, charge what they charge... you should do OK.

[steve]

Thank you DeltaFoxTrot, that's a great idea, and I've had a look, but I am also asking this community whether or not the absence of a face would be such a problem. If it is a problem, there's not much point me getting her to do these sexy wettings.

[Major Travis]

Personally, I would never pay for material where the girl doesn't show her face.

If you posted it for free and it was good, I'd cheer you. I'd offer congratulations on a job well done and tell you how hot your girlfriend was while wetting her pants.

But the simple fact is (for me anyway) that I want a face to complete the experience. I want the girl in my fetish fantasy to be more than an anonymous, faceless crotch with pee stains. I want to see her face, I'd prefer to hear her voice, and the bottom line is just that I've got too many options of places to spend my hard-earned cash to let it go for a girl that isn't willing to let me see her face in the bargain.

Others may disagree, and that is their right. I'd never criticize you in a public forum for posting (free) pics or vids of your girl with a mask or her face blurred or whatever. But neither will I pay you for the privilege of looking at her masked wettings when so many other women out there are happy to show their faces, as well, for my discriminating dollar.

[Peevert]

I want the girl in my fetish fantasy to be more than an anonymous, faceless crotch with pee stains. I want to see her face, I'd prefer to hear her voice, and the bottom line is just that I've got too many options of places to spend my hard-earned cash to let it go for a girl that isn't willing to let me see her face...

I was going to rant on this topic, but you already did it for me, and I agree 100%.

[mr_mess]

Agree

I think travis just hit the nail right on the head.

[MasterP]

i agree as well, can't say it better

[Apemantus]

Personally, I would never pay for material where the girl doesn't show her face.

If you posted it for free and it was good, I'd cheer you. I'd offer congratulations on a job well done and tell you how hot your girlfriend was while wetting her pants.

But the simple fact is (for me anyway) that I want a face to complete the experience. I want the girl in my fetish fantasy to be more than an anonymous, faceless crotch with pee stains. I want to see her face, I'd prefer to hear her voice, and the bottom line is just that I've got too many options of places to spend my hard-earned cash to let it go for a girl that isn't willing to let me see her face in the bargain.

Others may disagree, and that is their right. I'd never criticize you in a public forum for posting (free) pics or vids of your girl with a mask or her face blurred or whatever. But neither will I pay you for the privilege of looking at her masked wettings when so many other women out there are happy to show their faces, as well, for my discriminating dollar.

Absolutely echo these words, summarized perfectly all my views!

[tommy2tone]

Agreeing with the past couple posts

that all say how well the Major explained it.

[WIZZER]

Agreed

Yep I would agree with that too, there are plenty of faceless vids out there, I wouldn't waste your time.

[paco]

What Major Travis said.

[Scotsboy]

I have a question! I've convinced my girlfriend (20) to do some wetting for online. Understandably, she doesn't want to show her face, but quite willing to get her knickers very wet.

Are people generally interested in buying videos/images without seeing a face...ie in a kittykat mask or similar?

And if so, what do you generally expect to pay for images / videos?

Thank you for any replies.

If you has asked this around 10 years ago, you would have plenty of people offering to pay for this, but with the amount of wetting videos of women showing their face now being produced by different websites, I don't think you'll get such a strong response. Forgive the pun, but the market has now been flooded, and women unwilling to show their faces would be better to offer video clips for free, for sheer enjoyment than financial gain.

[Peevert]

I want the girl in my fetish fantasy to be more than an anonymous, faceless crotch with pee stains.

I think that particular line says a lot about us, and what we're all trying to find. We're not looking for some random pussy to pee on us. It's not just sexual. We're looking for the complete package, the girl friend experience.

[burningblood97]

Personally, I would never pay for material where the girl doesn't show her face.

If you posted it for free and it was good, I'd cheer you. I'd offer congratulations on a job well done and tell you how hot your girlfriend was while wetting her pants.

But the simple fact is (for me anyway) that I want a face to complete the experience. I want the girl in my fetish fantasy to be more than an anonymous, faceless crotch with pee stains. I want to see her face, I'd prefer to hear her voice, and the bottom line is just that I've got too many options of places to spend my hard-earned cash to let it go for a girl that isn't willing to let me see her face in the bargain.

Others may disagree, and that is their right. I'd never criticize you in a public forum for posting (free) pics or vids of your girl with a mask or her face blurred or whatever. But neither will I pay you for the privilege of looking at her masked wettings when so many other women out there are happy to show their faces, as well, for my discriminating dollar.

This.
My message was too short, so I added this useless sentence.

[steve]

Wow, thank you everyone for your responses.

I was expecting childish flaming, but I actually got serious replies.

I personally, agree with all of you. I certainly wouldn't pay for such a product - I was just hoping that some people might

Thank you