Test of Y/T clip removal policy

[Patches]

It has been suggested on this forum multiple times that Y/T removes wetting clips that are linked from this website. If it is true, then I suspect it is a sexist policy and only results in clips of girls being removed. So, I am wondering what happens if a clip of a guy wetting his underwear is posted on Y/T. To begin the test, here is a clip of a guy wetting his shorts. It is a new post that was put up today from someone who only has one clip.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOKR4_1Kd70

Let the test begin!

[Dusty Harold]

Still There

Patches ,
I must have been the first to test your theory out on this thread .

I Hope others will do the same and prove that you might have been correct

Very Good luck there in that Y/T has something against . This website and those of us who really do enjoy watching everything you post here on this site .

Keep it Going , Patches , You're Doing Very Well ! !

Dusty Harold

[mojo]

Youtube launches for me, but all I get is a black box where the video should be. There's no disclaimer about removal or anything, just a black screen.

[Patches]

@ mojo

You probably didn't wait long enough. Besides the black screen, you should have seen a moving circle in the middle of it indicating that the clip was loading. So far, there have been 14 views of the clip and it is still there.

[Patches]

Hey! Y/T Police! Wake Up! There are guys peeing in their underwear and posting clips of their activities!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS34JiRGHuA

Aren't you going to remove the clips like you do with the girls who wet their panties? Or is it only girls who wet themselves who violate your policies? Are you guys gay or something? You only want to watch guys wet themselves!

To those of you who are reading this forum, I know you probably don't want to watch guys wet themselves (unless you are one of the few girls in here) but click on these links so it gets the attention of the Y/T censors. Let's see if we can get a little equal treatment here!

[burningblood97]

Well, if I had to guess, the female videos are being flagged. I don't think these videos with male wettings are being flagged.

[brian prime]

i have always thought that as there are blokes on there doing exactly what the girls are being banned for, and how can it be ok to see someone getting their head kicked in when a girl peeing is found as offensive? the site needs competition as its lost the plot.

[Narada]

Try the test with some female wetting clips!

[mojo]

@ mojo

You probably didn't wait long enough. Besides the black screen, you should have seen a moving circle in the middle of it indicating that the clip was loading. So far, there have been 14 views of the clip and it is still there.

No, I tried it 3 or 4 times and got the same result. Anyway, today it loaded and played. I didn't watch the whole thing though.

[Dusty Harold]

Success

Patches ! ! ,
Very good news I just now clicked on the link to this video .
It has been removed ! ! You are correct in your theory that the Y/T police were on the job again ! !

Very Well Done , Patches , what now ?

Since they are most likely watching out , but , that they might be watching your account as well on how many times you post a link here from there for others to view what you have found there for us .

I know you are a ultimate Mystery Woman to me , Though , I wonder if you will encounter any trouble from Y/T . That of your cloak of disguise . That helps you navigate through their watchful eyes on there .

Great job , Patches , you make a really Great detective at what you enjoy doing .

You are right up there with the Cape Crusader in what you have done in establishing & proving your point in all of this .

I wonder what will happen next with what you have found & where do we go from here ?

Dusty Harold

[wetcanadian]

my channel

my vids have been up for a year, but no deletions.... my channel is abodde83

[Anything4mybabe]

Patches ! ! ,
Very good news I just now clicked on the link to this video .
It has been removed ! ! You are correct in your theory that the Y/T police were on the job again ! !

Very Well Done , Patches , what now ?

Since they are most likely watching out , but , that they might be watching your account as well on how many times you post a link here from there for others to view what you have found there for us .

I know you are a ultimate Mystery Woman to me , Though , I wonder if you will encounter any trouble from Y/T . That of your cloak of disguise . That helps you navigate through their watchful eyes on there .

Great job , Patches , you make a really Great detective at what you enjoy doing .

You are right up there with the Cape Crusader in what you have done in establishing & proving your point in all of this .

I wonder what will happen next with what you have found & where do we go from here ?

Dusty Harold

Err link still works for me so no its only female wetting that is offensive

[PeePeeper]

They have pulled the plug at the time of this post.

[Patches]

Y/T removed the clip at my second link at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS34JiRGHuA but they did not remove the clip at my first link at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOKR4_1Kd70 which I find strange since the first link is more explicit than the second link was.

In both clips, the guy was peeing in his underwear. Besides the first one being more explicit, the only difference was the first guy only had one video clip and has just opened his account whereas the second guy had a total of 4 video clips and two of them involved wetting his underwear. His account has been open longer than the first guy.

I don't think the length of time a Y/T account is open has anything to do with it. I have seen some girls have their clips and/or account removed the first day they open the account and post a clip of wetting themselves.

This test is leading me to think there is no sexual bias by Y/T and they will delete any clips posted of either sex. Also, I am not seeing any consistent removal based on whether there is a link from this Wet Set Forum. I suspect removal may be based on some arbitrary threshold of complaints from viewers who see the clips and think they should not be shown to anyone. If anyone wants to test that theory, ahhh.... nevermind, before I finished this sentence the first video was removed by the user. I will let you know if I find some other clips of guys wetting their underwear that we can complain about to Y/T.

[quietpr11]

I don't think youtube has any kind of sex-based biased...but if there is one, it is in the complaints. A guy peeing his pants is likely to be seen by most YT viewers (male and female) as merely gross, but a girl doing it may have a sexual connotation for some who may find it offensive (repressing their own fascination, maybe? )

It may also be that YT has people employed who regular search key words with known pornographic meanings and that those keywords tend to get used more with females wetting than with males (because women are more often doing it to get that kind of attention or because there is a bigger male audience who will post such things with sexual titles or respond in the comments with sexual words). Fact of life #1 for fetishists...there are far more men than women with fetishes and it impacts how women vs. men are seen when they engage in activities that may have a fetish connotation.